That really shows how much you understand a market. You can't sell that much coin, it would crash the market in no time. That's why a market cap is not indication of market value. Man, you have no idea what you are talking about.

actually he can easily, by just selling small portions at a time

24% of dark is theoretically 15M USD. Not bad for 10 wallets.
I´d be scared as hell, if i had 1.5 million USD in a single wallet. Secure and back it up like a grazy man.  

Not all ?

Darkwallet is, a wallet. Darkcoin is a coin and a currency. Completely different things. Darkwallet requires extra steps and requires you to install and trust a browser plugin. This is ok for some use, but Darkcoin has all this and more built in - and much better anonymity and privacy. Also, Darkcoin has solved one of the big problems Bitcoin is having - Bitcoin's network is becoming more and more centralized because there is no incentive in hosting nodes, whereas Darkcoin's idea of giving a percentage of block rewards to nodes solves this problem.

Lol, you have not seen daylight in yonks. The same people bought the coins not sold them, is this how the distribution works?



Let's summarize it for you

• 2 million instamined in 24 hours
• 1 million mined with extrem high block reward in the first month
• this instamined coins where then sold low to other accounts of themselves to keep miners away and difficulty down
• dev bought the coins by the bucked-load
• no windows/mac wallet or pools on release to keep people stranded in the dark
• max supply of 84mil was reduced to 22mil after a month or so
• large amount of trading with other accounts the darkscamers controlled to stir up attention
• wolla, scam finished, demand is high, supply all in the hand of the darkscamers and dumm fish are on the hook

dev knows 100% anonymity and ASIC resistance is just a gag

Manfred: Miners mine, miners sell. Distribution occurs.

What's exactly your problem? That eduffield bought his own coin from the miners?

Oh yes, because that doesn't fit the theory that he instamined 2 million coins himself. For if he had, why buy from miners? According to that theory he not only instamined, but actually ...solo-mined the 100% of the coin... So there shouldn't be any miners... right. But there were (even cpu farms were on it), and they were also selling for cheap (100k DRKs for 2.5 BTC)

So why is the dev accused ? For buying coins from the miners? Such horror.

Not commenting on instamine issue. Just want to say - plz you Windows users stop crying about not having wallet compiled... Just learn how to compile those wallets yourself from source like!!! You got to learn it once and then it's easy job for almost all other wallets.
First of all it's not compulsory for dev to compile such wallet but you even might install some virus pretending to be wallet and have no option of verifing from which source it was compiled (some dev may release whole coin just to let you install wallet that steals BTC/LTC/etc. wallets from your pc).