I don't know about Anoncoin but Java is a serious vector for online malware and is one of the most vulnerable software out there, a c++ router would be much more safer.
Thanks, these both help a lot! The point I'm trying to make is that to anyone who has never been to this thread or heard of Monero before, this can and will look like a lot of useless coding when there's already a working implementation. (example - I continue to use windows although its a massive attack vector .. but it gives me AutoCAD so I use it instead of ubuntu on my main computer)
As Anoncoin was first in the implementation, it will be an absolute necessity that I2P with Monero is marketed otherwise it's just going to cause a lot of confusion. I promise that will be the result if this isn't made clear. I figured two weeks would be a good time frame before I started pushing for a discussion.
What other valid reasons can you think of dewdeded? Also, lol at the link that's a lot of problems!
Please keep in mind I'm not looking to bash Anoncoin, but instead I'm trying to find a marketable definition of why that wasn't good enough.
How much safer would you think it would be Nekomata? What kind of safety issues outside of malware vectors are there, if any?