Yes I know bryce made a lot of shit coins but this was not supposed to be one of them

bryce said in a intervieuw that he was doing things for naut ? so far he seems only to hurt it but again bk would love to hear your opinion about it.
Here is my opinion on alts-coins in general:
They only have value if they solve an economic problem. I am not a coder or cryptographer, but I do know that changing the algo does not solve an economic problem, therefore most coins will ultimately have zero value.
The economic problem that NAUT is attempting to solve is creating a better, friction-less payment network. The sale to a merchant is easy...would you rather pay Mastercard 2% or use NAUT for free...just take a look at what BitPay is doing. There is no reason why NAUT can't follow the same business model. However, there are many steps before NAUT becomes a real payment network. The first is a deep liquid market which I believe we have created and it is now my job to maintain that liquidity and stability with the NSF.
I believe there is real value in alt-coins, they can be used to raise capital, donate to charity and a host other real world economic uses. The most technologically advanced alt-coin will not necessarily be the winner...Ferrari makes a great car, but Ford sells more vehicles...