Damn you guys beat me to that tip
Also make sure you backup every time you send something from your wallet. (This is has to do with how change addresses are managed)

the 1 week and 3 day chart look magnificent

I read somewhere that bitcoin type clients use a a range of hidden internal addresses that you dont see, and that after so many transactions keys change or something. I remember it being around 20 but that's just the figure I saw.   I'd like to know more about how it works.   I am tending to back up more often after reading about that.

Yes that's correct, you don't have to backup after every send. But then again you need to know when your wallet ran out of the generated addresses and created a new one to store the change.

There are other ways to address this (like pre-generating more addresses when the wallet is created), but backing up after every send is the safest option (and I am paranoid )
Also I don't do a lot of sends from my wallets, so it's not too much of a hassle for me to do every time (which is only a very few times anyway ... long time holder here )

Because I was responding to a question.

Ugg... And now Brian Kelly is pro-regulation?

Gross. This is the antithesis of what cryptocurrency is all about.

The reason why cryptocurrency is necessitated is because Wall Street has hijacked everyone's ability to conduct business in terms of dollars in a fair, transparent manner.

Public opinion hasn't had an effect on legislative outcomes for almost 4 decades because our laws are written by lobbyists. You'd have to be naive to not understand this by now.

So once official, federally-mandated regulation is in place, who is it more likely to be helping? Be honest with yourself.

I don't know if you guys have noticed, but the users of coins aren't exactly clamoring for regulation. To my knowledge, BK is the ONLY one who is.

I'm out.

We have about one scam a day with people creating coins with hidden malware, hidden premines, devs lying about features, pumps and dumps etc. In my opinion some form of regulation will be a good thing to help differentiate the more serious projects from all the scams.

Of course you'll still have your anonymous coins created by anonymous devs, and that's fine for what it is. But Nautiluscoin isn't intended to be used as a way of bringing the government down - it's intended (as far as I know) to be the coin with the highest level of compliance, openness, professionalism and trust. This will make it something that both regular people and high-level investors feel safe enough to invest in, and use as a store of value. If you're uncomfortable with this then it's certainly a good idea to look into other coins. That's the advantage of crypto - there's a coin for everyone

People wanted bitcoin to be widely accepted and reach new highs, I can't see that happening without some regulation. Buying NAUT then crying on here about regs must be a joke, didn't she read page one?

I know regs are a nightmare but so are blatant scammers. Remember when fontase got featured in NY Times and disappeared? The daily mail will have a field day and crypto will suffer when these stories go mainstream. These scams are happening every day now, bigger players must be a little concerned even if they don't show it.

No, its not legal at all. Theft is theft.


Look, the reason why cryptocurrency exists is because Wall Street sucks. It is 99.9% evil, filled to the brim with spoiled scoundrels who care more about money more life itself. They are destroying the rest of the planet so they can have WAAAYYY too much, and you basically just want to congratulate them and validate their efforts.

Why are you trying so hard to bring Wall Street into the very thing that was trying to get away from it?


I can see it happening because it already is.