Wow... I can see clearly now the fud is gone... gonna be a bright, bright, bright, sun shiny day.

Thanks Kevondo, this is the current state and I have mentioned it multiple times.  If you are very concerned PM me and I will give as much info as I can, thanks.  We have not used the VeriFund and only would after talking with the community first.

Also it is getting harder and harder for us to keep up to date on every forum post.  If you have concerns that are urgent or pressing please email vericoin@vericoin.info, this forwards to all three devs.  Or pm us here, it's easy to miss a question or comment here, thanks.

Once again, the evidence shows the reality of things: We have two children (the third doesn't even seem to interfere in these types of things), leading this.
I can only imagine the expert salespeople of Coinsis handling these two in their conversations... but hey, what do you expect? Let's be real.

Once again, first of all, the Visa deal is not even a deal worth mentioning on any level for it is something of no significance whatsoever, therefore it should have been mentioned only at the time where implementation would be only pending majority approval by the stakeholders (that would be US, the owners of the coin). If, as it seems, Nosker was so compelled to mention it for the purpose of hyping (as everyone knows I am ALL for "hyping" -creating momentum, actually-), there wouldn't have been any NDA violation simply stating that VRC was in active discussion for a credit card company to include it in it's rooster of clients. Truth, no details, and same hype... only with people in the forums -people like me and others- clarifying pros and cons long before vote submissions.

Instead, the band that can't shoot straight, makes the announcement several months before it can be implemented, with a company that no one knows and, apparently, at a cost no one will ever be willing to pay -because it isn't worth it not even remotely-. Wow, not only children running the ship but not the sharpest children you could find.

In any event, as stated above, this deal will probably never materialize. If it does will be yet another negative for Vericoin for no one will use it and, above all, it isn't anything different -only bigger fees and payment in advance-, from the link to Moolah in the wallet... only a portable link in plastic. To even dedicate two minutes to think, let alone discuss it, is just a total waste of time.

This is just amazing, really:

What Vericoin has:

1.- Verybit. Every coin has it. Every single one even much less established than Vericoin. You exchange it for BTC (including the waiting times of up to one hour and more of BTC), and then it is golden. Exactly the same process as if you would sell your coins in an exchange and paid from that account in BTC. Amazing "asset", isn't it?

2.- VeriSMS. You can use your mobile phone when you don't have internet service ( Maybe in the Himalaya mountains, high, really high on them??). OK, let's assume that you just WANT to use it and not bother with your internet. You will have to input the wallet address of any recipient of your funds... an d that is not exactly a walk in the park, is it? Chances are, 99.99% of the time, that you will send your irretrievable VRCs to someone not even remotely intended to.
The expected usage of this "feature" is 1 in 1 million transactions... being quite generous. Oh, lets not forget that, according to the roadmap, the devs are in the (long ) process of eliminating the need to input the wallet's addresses by copying/pasting what boxxa's has already implemente in PINK.

3.- Verisend. Since it is optional, no one will use it of course by the simple reason that it is so low in the ranking of purported anonymous ways to send money, that it will be like using generic bleach instead of clorox, for the same price.

Now, if you look at the other "features" listed as in different levels of progression, you will see that there's no real path but a diversity of projects of no significance whatsoever that will never either be implemented or used or both. Of note is the mention of the multi-pool that still doesn't work proper (it's a random thing), that still pays much less than any savvy investor will get on their own and that, obviously, bachelor number 3 doesn't have any idea of how to fix properly.

Now people insist that I must be "nice" instead of blunt and  "positive" in my criticism (as it that wasn't a contradiction in terms). How can you, if you are not full of shit and willing to lie? How?

And just as I was typing this you posted three more times...all negative and none productive rantings and ramblings. I rest my case...

Actually Barrabas is right about Veribit, Verisend and VeriSMS. All are completely useless functions and certainly don't put vericoin in the league of innovative coins. No wonder the statistic indicates the three features have 9 users worldwide (from the 9 users 3 are the developers). Hardly creative and innovative ideas like Veribit, Verisend and VeriSMS are not good enough, no wonder the price is 9k.

Being evasive is a dominant trait of yours.  

We are supposed to take you seriously because?.

Calling 3 adult people stooges, and many insults littered throughout your postings.

You once said you would bring something to the table far superior to what others could produce.

You came up with the above image, recieved negative feedback and the history of chat shows the change in attitude.

Are you here because you want to see failure?.

You tasked it upon your self to go ahead with WVD, and you failed spectacularly at it.

So do you bring positives or negatives, simple yes or no will suffice.

That's all you got barabbass? Picking out a spelling mistake? You have multiple spelling and grammar errors your posts...don't see me picking those apart.

How about addressing the question?