 |
May 11, 2014, 12:26:26 PM |
|
If politicians are faced With lobbyists saying:
"Bitcoin is bad, bad bad bad. We need a ban,ban ban ban"
they are going to think "What the hell is this? Bitcoin? Ban? Why?"
Then the lobbyists will say, ofcourse:
"Because it's bad, bad bad bad. Our masters want it banned, ban ban ban".
Then, if Bitcoin has 0 lobbyists, the politicians will think something funny is going on.
"Why ban a New innovation like Bitcoin? God, if only the lobbyists would be allowed to stick Money directly into my Pocket this would be so much easier. Now they can't, so we need to look like we make decisions based on Our own opinions."
Then take the other alternative, IF bitcoin has lobbyists. That could only play out in 1 way. Politicians in the middle and 2 snakes in each ear trying to convince them to take a half open bribe. This, ofcourse, will make bitcoin win. But, it's short term.
What bitcoin needs in this area is a self-evolved resistance. They shouldn't feel like being in the middle of a fight between CRYPTO-terrorism-currencies and established Banks. Politcians love banks, theyve been on their side for the last 100+ years. They should feel as if they are being told by these banks to ban innovation and an inevitable evolution of Money. Cause that's what this sht is. If we lobby for it, we become what we fight. That door all e-currency users and Developers must Lock.
|