<<  >> (p.29)
    Author Topic: [ Bonus PPS Pool - 130% PPS - OPEN ]  (Read 94373 times)

    • -ck
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4522
    Merit: 1669


    Ruu \o/


    View Profile WWW
    May 03, 2012, 08:23:57 AM
     #561
    The previous code definitely was not polite and had a "take no prisoners" approach so it would bombard by default for the miner's benefit and if anything went wrong at the pool end, the pool would get hammered.
    Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
    2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
    -ck

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 08:39:53 AM
     #562
    Quote from: ckolivas on May 03, 2012, 08:23:57 AM
    The previous code definitely was not polite and had a "take no prisoners" approach so it would bombard by default for the miner's benefit and if anything went wrong at the pool end, the pool would get hammered.

    Seems fairly accurate with what Ive noticed from the poolside, just replace hammer with nuclear bomb Cheesy
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • DutchBrat
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 868
    Merit: 1000


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 09:48:31 AM
     #563
    We're not there yet I'm guessing, even with the new version of CGMiner

    Code:
    cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (5s):314.4 (avg):296.8 Mh/s | Q:573  A:285  R:18  HW:0  E:50%  U:3.7/m
     TQ: 2  ST: 9  SS: 5  DW: 158  NB: 9  LW: 731  GF: 7  RF: 6
     Connected to http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80 with LP as user DutchBrat
     Block: 00000a50b14e181ee2eddb662905d6da...  Started: [11:40:04]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
     GPU 0:  73.0C 2436RPM | 312.3/296.8Mh/s | A:285 R:18 HW:0 U: 3.73/m I: 5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     [2012-05-03 11:45:07] Accepted cd1d2d67.dbb1ffa3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:10] Accepted aecd4b84.ee3321f3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:14] Accepted 5ac588ed.f944086e GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:39] Accepted 4ba3b78c.43439465 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:46] Accepted 033d897c.54c84c35 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:16] Pool 0 communication failure, caching submissions
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Pool 0 communication resumed, submitting work
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Rejected bc157d83.3ba10608 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:53] Rejected dcc02b84.454b2080 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:59] Rejected 5396d980.319d0554 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:06] Rejected b659cd6f.299f9fcd GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:26] Accepted 17cc28c1.95018954 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:32] Accepted 708e48de.01d0c49c GPU 0 pool 0

     Wink

  • -ck
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4522
    Merit: 1669


    Ruu \o/


    View Profile WWW
    May 03, 2012, 09:55:29 AM
     #564
    Quote from: DutchBrat on May 03, 2012, 09:48:31 AM
    We're not there yet I'm guessing, even with the new version of CGMiner

    Code:
    cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (5s):314.4 (avg):296.8 Mh/s | Q:573  A:285  R:18  HW:0  E:50%  U:3.7/m
     TQ: 2  ST: 9  SS: 5  DW: 158  NB: 9  LW: 731  GF: 7  RF: 6
     Connected to http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80 with LP as user DutchBrat
     Block: 00000a50b14e181ee2eddb662905d6da...  Started: [11:40:04]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
     GPU 0:  73.0C 2436RPM | 312.3/296.8Mh/s | A:285 R:18 HW:0 U: 3.73/m I: 5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     [2012-05-03 11:45:07] Accepted cd1d2d67.dbb1ffa3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:10] Accepted aecd4b84.ee3321f3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:14] Accepted 5ac588ed.f944086e GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:39] Accepted 4ba3b78c.43439465 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:46] Accepted 033d897c.54c84c35 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:16] Pool 0 communication failure, caching submissions
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Pool 0 communication resumed, submitting work
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Rejected bc157d83.3ba10608 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:53] Rejected dcc02b84.454b2080 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:59] Rejected 5396d980.319d0554 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:06] Rejected b659cd6f.299f9fcd GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:26] Accepted 17cc28c1.95018954 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:32] Accepted 708e48de.01d0c49c GPU 0 pool 0

     Wink
    That's the code being polite... you should see what it would have done before.
    Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
    2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
    -ck

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 10:08:09 AM
     #565
    Quote from: ckolivas on May 03, 2012, 09:55:29 AM
    Quote from: DutchBrat on May 03, 2012, 09:48:31 AM
    We're not there yet I'm guessing, even with the new version of CGMiner

    Code:
    cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (5s):314.4 (avg):296.8 Mh/s | Q:573  A:285  R:18  HW:0  E:50%  U:3.7/m
     TQ: 2  ST: 9  SS: 5  DW: 158  NB: 9  LW: 731  GF: 7  RF: 6
     Connected to http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80 with LP as user DutchBrat
     Block: 00000a50b14e181ee2eddb662905d6da...  Started: [11:40:04]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
     GPU 0:  73.0C 2436RPM | 312.3/296.8Mh/s | A:285 R:18 HW:0 U: 3.73/m I: 5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     [2012-05-03 11:45:07] Accepted cd1d2d67.dbb1ffa3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:10] Accepted aecd4b84.ee3321f3 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:14] Accepted 5ac588ed.f944086e GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:39] Accepted 4ba3b78c.43439465 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:45:46] Accepted 033d897c.54c84c35 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:16] Pool 0 communication failure, caching submissions
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Pool 0 communication resumed, submitting work
     [2012-05-03 11:46:37] Rejected bc157d83.3ba10608 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:53] Rejected dcc02b84.454b2080 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:46:59] Rejected 5396d980.319d0554 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:06] Rejected b659cd6f.299f9fcd GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:26] Accepted 17cc28c1.95018954 GPU 0 pool 0
     [2012-05-03 11:47:32] Accepted 708e48de.01d0c49c GPU 0 pool 0

     Wink
    That's the code being polite... you should see what it would have done before.

    LOL , all of those rejects are related to me working on pool, but I also need to wait patiently for everyone to connect back with cgminr 2.4 since im sure only 1 or 2 so far have switched.

    I can clearly see with my 2.4 connection its handling established connections much better and also havnt seen tripling of connections at LP however a bunch of users are still on 2.3.6 which clearly shows that.
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • ThiagoCMC
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1204
    Merit: 1000

    ฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 12:08:02 PM
     #566
    Quote from: Clipse on May 03, 2012, 08:08:06 AM
    UPDATE:

    Please update to CGMINER 2.4 as soon as possible, https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/28402.0

    Update to 2.4.0 done! Added --no-submit-stale...

    Cheers!
    Thiago

  • ThiagoCMC
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1204
    Merit: 1000

    ฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 01:01:14 PM
     #567
    Quote from: ThiagoCMC on May 03, 2012, 12:08:02 PM
    Quote from: Clipse on May 03, 2012, 08:08:06 AM
    UPDATE:

    Please update to CGMINER 2.4 as soon as possible, https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/28402.0

    Update to 2.4.0 done! Added --no-submit-stale...

    Cheers!
    Thiago

    Also, I'll add the cgminer option --no-pool-disable because BonusPool is getting disabled sometimes and will never back again, until I restart cgminer, I think... Am I right?!

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 01:19:02 PM
     #568
    Quote from: ThiagoCMC on May 03, 2012, 01:01:14 PM
    Quote from: ThiagoCMC on May 03, 2012, 12:08:02 PM
    Quote from: Clipse on May 03, 2012, 08:08:06 AM
    UPDATE:

    Please update to CGMINER 2.4 as soon as possible, https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/28402.0

    Update to 2.4.0 done! Added --no-submit-stale...

    Cheers!
    Thiago

    Also, I'll add the cgminer option --no-pool-disable because BonusPool is getting disabled sometimes and will never back again, until I restart cgminer, I think... Am I right?!

    I think that option makes sure that a pool doesnt disable as you described.
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • -ck
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4522
    Merit: 1669


    Ruu \o/


    View Profile WWW
    May 03, 2012, 01:39:11 PM
     #569
    Quote from: ThiagoCMC on May 03, 2012, 01:01:14 PM
    Also, I'll add the cgminer option --no-pool-disable because BonusPool is getting disabled sometimes and will never back again, until I restart cgminer, I think... Am I right?!
    Like most defaults in cgminer, it is better to not add that option. If you get banned from a pool, cgminer can work around it, but if you add that option, you could waste a lot of time on a banned pool.
    Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
    2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
    -ck

  • MrTeal
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1274
    Merit: 1004


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 08:18:18 PM
     #570
    Are you doing some work, Clipse? I've noticed a huge upswing in rejects since switching to 2.4.0, and I'm not sure if it's pool or miner related. On BonusPool, my miners are running 6.2%(300MH), 4.4%(2x200MH), 2.6% (4x330MH), and 5.7%(375MH). These are since switching over to 2.4 this morning, using the new pool information function in CGMiner, and with BTCGuild and Slush as backup pools.

  • Inaba
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1260
    Merit: 1000



    View Profile WWW
    May 03, 2012, 08:24:12 PM
     #571
    I'm seeing the same thing.
    If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 08:59:16 PM
     #572
    Sorry was out, yes taking it down checking through logs dont know why its spewing these rejects now. I allmost got this under control, shrug.
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • exahash
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 278
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 09:22:00 PM
     #573
    Which mining software causes you the fewest problems, Clipse?

    You might want to gently recommend it for anyone who's not married to their software.

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 09:34:26 PM
     #574
    Quote from: exahash on May 03, 2012, 09:22:00 PM
    Which mining software causes you the fewest problems, Clipse?

    You might want to gently recommend it for anyone who's not married to their software.

    Ive never had any issues with poclbm, but dont hold me to that since changes Ive now made could have turned poclbm to crap aswell, I know for a fact there is issues with pool that I need to resolve so I have another guy now working on details that I pulled from log, there is progress even when it seems like all is doomed Smiley
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • cuz0882
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 392
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 03, 2012, 11:41:47 PM
     #575
    Sounds like cgminer 2.4 is not a good idea. It will just disable the pool after a number of rejected shares. The --no-pool-disable option even sounds worse.

  • -ck
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4522
    Merit: 1669


    Ruu \o/


    View Profile WWW
    May 04, 2012, 03:28:00 AM
     #576
    Quote from: cuz0882 on May 03, 2012, 11:41:47 PM
    Sounds like cgminer 2.4 is not a good idea. It will just disable the pool after a number of rejected shares. The --no-pool-disable option even sounds worse.
    He just said he's been having trouble with the pool and the pool's been rejecting all the work. cgminer is doing the right thing and disconnecting you from a pool that's misbehaving. Why do you think this behaviour is bad? Would you prefer it to spend a day submitting nothing but rejects till you noticed it yourself?

    edit: the --no-pool-disable option just disables this feature if you'd rather submit rejects indefinitely
    Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
    2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
    -ck

  • cuz0882
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 392
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 04, 2012, 03:37:57 AM
     #577
    Quote from: ckolivas on May 04, 2012, 03:28:00 AM
    Quote from: cuz0882 on May 03, 2012, 11:41:47 PM
    Sounds like cgminer 2.4 is not a good idea. It will just disable the pool after a number of rejected shares. The --no-pool-disable option even sounds worse.
    He just said he's been having trouble with the pool and the pool's been rejecting all the work. cgminer is doing the right thing and disconnecting you from a pool that's misbehaving. Why do you think this behaviour is bad? Would you prefer it to spend a day submitting nothing but rejects till you noticed it yourself?

    edit: the --no-pool-disable option just disables this feature if you'd rather submit rejects indefinitely
    It's bad if it never reconnects you to the pool... I've never had the older version stuck on a pool that was not working...

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 04, 2012, 04:17:42 AM
     #578
    UPDATE:

    Pool handled pretty decent over the night at 0.9% rejects for me with about 90% of the normal users connected. Everyone should try reconnect their miners and see if it keeps up without causing the same issues of yesterday.
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)

  • ThiagoCMC
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1204
    Merit: 1000

    ฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


    View Profile
    May 04, 2012, 06:07:12 AM
     #579
    Quote from: Clipse on May 04, 2012, 04:17:42 AM
    UPDATE:

    Pool handled pretty decent over the night at 0.9% rejects for me with about 90% of the normal users connected. Everyone should try reconnect their miners and see if it keeps up without causing the same issues of yesterday.


    I'm still out...   Cry

  • Clipse (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    May 04, 2012, 06:13:45 AM
    Last edit: May 04, 2012, 02:23:04 PM by Clipse
     #580
    PAYMENT UPDATE:

    Sorry about another payment delay, I am getting to that within the next couple of hours or by the latest end of Friday night if unable to do so earlier. The server issues been too hectic for me to stay on time processing manual payments in a timely manner, this will get sorted out as soon as I can nail the pool issues for good.
    ...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

    We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 »
      Print  
Page 28
Viewing Page: 29

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com