FAUCET!!

Hmmmmm.... We were just reviewing 'coins' to add last night, to keep profitability up.

We do have plans to add additional algorithms on the Multi-Pool....

If we had reason to believe that a new algorithm would increase the hash on the pool, as opposed to diluting it - we are not against that at all!

---

Easy enough to put together -> but we have no ready-made pre-mine to pump into it; it would need to be a community affair.

---

Just want to re-iterate something we have said recently, via Twitter.
I will simply copy the relevant 'tweet's:

"A promise to all CLAMS users: the block chain has no moral opinion. We will never fork to seize coins."
https://twitter.com/ClamClient/status/488504931758776321

"A bookkeeper who "fudges" the books, has no place being trusted to keep the public ledger. Pressure is moot."
https://twitter.com/ClamClient/status/488506196886708224

"VeriCoin, Do this fork, and you have successfully 51% double spent your own network."
https://twitter.com/ClamClient/status/488508451161534464

If you agree, let those who hear your voice know that CLAMS believes in only the block chain as the arbiter of the public ledger...

X11 is consistently more profitable then nscrypt lately, specifically with ATI cards and 14.6 drivers.  I'd probably throw some hash back on the khashier if you supported X11.

You rock.  IMO, the VRC move is unbelievable - rolling back a blockchain for external non-technical reasons is disturbing at best, disrespects the entire idea of a decentralized ledger, and I would go as far as to say represents an entirely dishonest act.

With that many clams, you're probably fine leaving them as one output.  It's when you have lots of clams that it starts making sense to split them up.

Actually it seems that if they need splitting up, they will be split up automatically for you eventually. Then possibly recombined, re-split, etc. The client seems a little confused.

I never really read the OP before.

Here are some comments:


There's a spare ] in the URL which is probably a mistake.


The code (src/main.cpp) says:


Note the comment says 8 hours, but the code itself says 4 hours.


"You're".


The "to" is missing.


This section says nothing about how to get your clams.


This section does - so we don't need the previous one?


You're assuming people are using Windows. The argument is "-salvagewallet" (all one word, 2nd dash optional).


It's above, not below isn't it?


I prefer lowercase.

I got bored at that point and stopped reading. I don't mine, so the stuff about khashier isn't of interest to me.

Hope that's helpful.

anyone can ask me why i cant download the windows wallet?

yes i have

but i cant open mega.co.nz

Might be a Great Firewall issue maybe?  Are you located in China by chance?

FWIW: I'm in Australia, and have never been able to download anything from mega.co.nz. I either get a dialog complaining about local storage space, or an endless turning cog wheel. So there's no need to tease feryjhie about his/her internet connection.

If you use file sharing websites that have fancy javascript necessary to grab files it's probably a good idea to include a more "standard" website as backup.

Thank you, I have downloaded the update and re-sync my block index and now It's 0k! Thank you again..