<<  >> (p.35)
    Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145112 times)

    • gilad215
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 430
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 06:27:36 PM
     #681
    Guys could use some help

    6x280x Pentium Haswell 4GB RAM = 1930h/s
    5x280x Pentium Haswell 2GB RAM = 2200h/s

    the 6x280x rig is slower, is the CPU the problem? is there any -ss option for the miner? anyone with 6xgpus can help?

    thank you
    Neluns
    ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦
    Pre-sale on Aug, 1

  • kqpahv
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 229
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:04:52 PM
     #682
    Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.



    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0


    430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
    460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
    466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W


    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1


    433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
    457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
    463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:37:47 PM
     #683
    Well, I think -1% of mining speed worth -10% of power. If you don't like it - use v3.0.
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • surfer43
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 560
    Merit: 250


    "Trading Platform of The Future!"


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:37:59 PM
     #684
    MoneroPool.org is back! 0% fees for now

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:40:38 PM
     #685
    Quote from: surfer43 on June 20, 2014, 07:37:59 PM
    MoneroPool.org is back! 0% fees for now

    Update link for my miner, v1.2 is too old Smiley
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • kqpahv
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 229
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:45:53 PM
     #686
    Quote from: Claymore on June 20, 2014, 07:37:47 PM
    Well, I think -1% of mining speed worth -10% of power. If you don't like it - use v3.0.

    Obviously  Wink

    Never said I dint like it, I was just wondering how could anyone have high temps with 3.0 Huh
    Brought this table out just to inform others  Wink

  • sk00t3r
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 192
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 07:59:34 PM
     #687
    Quote from: kqpahv on June 20, 2014, 07:04:52 PM
    Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.



    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0


    430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
    460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
    466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W


    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1


    433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
    457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
    463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W

    Thanks man! It is good to see comparisson!

  • frenkyshka
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 34
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 08:14:14 PM
     #688
    I just cant make my sapphires dual x 280x to work like it should.
    4x280x is hashing at 1450hs.
    Tryed to run just one and result is 360-365hs.
    Win 7, 8gb, drivers r 13.12, virtual mem set to 16gb.
    Interesting thing is that i have same results on 1100mhz and on 950mhz gpu core clock.
    How can ppl run Asus on 450+ hs?

  • crowetic
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2296
    Merit: 1072


    https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org


    View Profile WWW
    June 20, 2014, 08:27:59 PM
     #689
    Quote from: frenkyshka on June 20, 2014, 08:14:14 PM
    I just cant make my sapphires dual x 280x to work like it should.
    4x280x is hashing at 1450hs.
    Tryed to run just one and result is 360-365hs.
    Win 7, 8gb, drivers r 13.12, virtual mem set to 16gb.
    Interesting thing is that i have same results on 1100mhz and on 950mhz gpu core clock.
    How can ppl run Asus on 450+ hs?

    my ASUS 280x's on default clocks hit 475h/s a piece. Not sure, I didn't make any changes.


                  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
                 ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
            ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
           ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
         ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
        ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
       ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                        ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
      ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                          ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                            ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
     ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                               ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
     ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                      ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                        ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▓▓▓▓▓
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▒▒▒▒▒▒     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓
       ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
       ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
        ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
          ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒            ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓
           ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒   ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
             ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
               ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
                  ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
                       ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ORTAL
    		    .⊙.Web and Application hosting.
         ⊙ decentralized infrastructure
        .⊙.leveling and voting.
    | https://qortal.org - Infrastructure for the future World
                Founder/current dev group facilitator
    [/td][/tr][/table]

    [/table]

  • kqpahv
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 229
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 08:31:46 PM
     #690
    Quote from: sk00t3r on June 20, 2014, 07:59:34 PM
    Quote from: kqpahv on June 20, 2014, 07:04:52 PM
    Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.



    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0


    430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
    460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
    466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W


    R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1


    433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
    457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
    463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W

    Thanks man! It is good to see comparisson!


    Scratch that, I just noticed I had the powered risers molex coming from another PSU  Angry So the wattage will be actually a bit higher. Will do a accurate measuring tomorrow

  • Barney
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 170
    Merit: 100

    RevolverCoin dev


    View Profile WWW
    June 20, 2014, 08:41:53 PM
     #691
    Getting
    "GpuMiner k1a failed -52"
    280x

    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT  100 set. Virtual memory set.
    v2.2 was ok. What could cause this issue?

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 08:47:26 PM
     #692
    Quote from: Barney on June 20, 2014, 08:41:53 PM
    Getting
    "GpuMiner k1a failed -52"
    280x

    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT  100 set. Virtual memory set.
    v2.2 was ok. What could cause this issue?


    Make sure that you use ALL files from new version. Not just replace old EXE by new, but also don't forget about "data.bin" file.
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • trip96
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 55
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
     #693
    I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.

    Here are my specs

    16gb ram
    i7 4770k
    msi 280x


    For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.

  • frenkyshka
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 34
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 09:01:35 PM
     #694
    Quote from: trip96 on June 20, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
    I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.

    Here are my specs

    16gb ram
    i7 4770k
    msi 280x


    For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.

    Allready tryed everything, it just wont work like it should.
    Claymore we need help here.

  • olajos
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 46
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 09:52:54 PM
     #695
    Quote from: trip96 on June 20, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
    I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.

    Here are my specs

    16gb ram
    i7 4770k
    msi 280x


    For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.

    mines run around 350 h/s with 280x

    catalyst 13.2
    athlon x2 250 cpu
    4gb ram
    20gb virtual
    windows 7 64 bit
    miner 3.1

    4x280x stock mem and gpu
     1400 h/s

    Help Claymore

  • pinoyminer1977
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 77
    Merit: 10



    View Profile WWW
    June 20, 2014, 09:55:35 PM
     #696
    Quote from: Palad1n on June 20, 2014, 04:26:04 PM
    2044 h/s on x3 r9 290.
    681 h/s each.

    Would you mine sharing your settings?

  • AceCobra1
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 364
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 10:10:20 PM
     #697
    are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?

    I find 85 gives me most hash

  • trip96
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 55
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 10:14:14 PM
     #698
    Quote from: olajos on June 20, 2014, 09:52:54 PM
    Quote from: trip96 on June 20, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
    I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.

    Here are my specs

    16gb ram
    i7 4770k
    msi 280x


    For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.

    mines run around 350 h/s with 280x

    catalyst 13.2
    athlon x2 250 cpu
    4gb ram
    20gb virtual
    windows 7 64 bit
    miner 3.1

    4x280x stock mem and gpu
     1400 h/s

    Help Claymore


    Hey just to give an update:

    Tried 13.10 that MSI recommends on their website. No luck

    Also tried 14.4 recommended from amd and no luck.

    I wonder if its on our end or the programs end?

    If anyone who has a 280x working well know of any tricks to try?

  • trip96
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 55
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 10:15:43 PM
     #699
    Quote from: AceCobra1 on June 20, 2014, 10:10:20 PM
    are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?

    I find 85 gives me most hash

    Yes I am using 100 percent as suggested in readme. I will try variation of that now starting with 85 percent. Thank you for the idea. Smiley

  • AceCobra1
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 364
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    June 20, 2014, 10:18:26 PM
     #700
    Quote from: trip96 on June 20, 2014, 10:15:43 PM
    Quote from: AceCobra1 on June 20, 2014, 10:10:20 PM
    are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?

    I find 85 gives me most hash

    Yes I am using 100 percent as suggested in readme. I will try variation of that now starting with 85 percent. Thank you for the idea. Smiley

    I read here 80 is best for some people... I find my miner too unstable at 100... Does 100 consume more power than 85 or does it not make any difference?

    What does GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT actually do?
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 325 »
      Print  
Page 34
Viewing Page: 35

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com