I dont think changing the logo is a good idea, the traditional NEM logo is known and established, and can be recognised by anyone that has had even brief exposure to NEM and especially no to the eagles! Its too much fascist/USSA... stick to the pheonix if you really need to change it!

I would sell magic mushrooms

heres to sense! I dont remember facebook or the olympics changing their logos

any timeline for launch yet?

They are not drastic changes like what is proposed for NEM

How about you show some of the logo timelines for companies that only include the changes over one year ? Even better would be pre-release.

What I'm saying is you can't even remotely compare it. If the "times" change and those changes make a logo change necessary it's not a bad thing but changing it because...well just because is imho a waste.

As what I said a few days ago, the current logo is fine.
NEM had not lauched officially, what the hell should we repick new logo so many times? Absolutely a waste of time.

fork coming at 43k, migrate to 0.5.16



P.S. new docs are out: http://bob.nem.ninja/docs/

Its nice, that everyone wants to participate, but if it goes on like this, every month another "genius" thinks, he found a better logo than the current one, and wants to change it. Thats not working. A brand should be stable... and it also costs a lot of effort every time to make polls and so on...
I think this energy can be used better...
to avoid further conflicts with the branding I suggest to satisfy people with a planned rebranding after 1 year running blockchain. Of course with the option, to keep the old one in the polls :-)

+1, good plan.
The current logo/branding is OK, and probably could be improved, but isn't a priority.
If NEM works, branding won't be all that important in the beginning, and if it doesn't work, eagles won't help.