Sorry Patmast3r.. but since Codtycoon was in the Member Team List, I was assuming it was actually in the Team  
I shouldn't have done that silly mistake.
Thanks for your attention.
I think you can now put me on Ignore Mode again.
From my understanding this one was the Unmoderated Thread.. the Moderated one was another one...
Anyway. I'm not talking about anything that is not NEM related. I'm not using a scurriluous language. I'm not attacking person,  I may have only replied in a more polite way to someone else attacks, without stating one, never ever. I think that would be more than acceptable according the the Forum rules.
So, exactly, what would the reason be to kick me out or shot my mouth or whatever you want me to do ?
Is not the first time you threat me telling me something like that. And always when my opinion is different from yours.
I'M JUST ANALYSING FACTS AND EVIDENCES posted here form someone else. It's in front of everyone's eyes.
No worries, I've already got screenshots of everything has bene posted, I was expecting a threat like this from your side.
I'm going to contact Bitcointalk right now, reporting your threatening message.I will ask them if there's something wrong in what I wrote, and if that the case, I'll be more then happy to remove/modify them.
Btw, there are other Forums, some even more influent than this one. If you want me to move there no problem at all.

How do u define them false accusations ? there's a difference between thesis and theories.
We were looking for proof, that's it. And the guy from Bittrex is not me. Is a guy that though it would have been better to post here. Has been his call, not mine.
Btw, Thanks for the hint. But since I have one and only ONE account here that will not be MY problem.

Thank you very much richie I really appreciate your honesty

Also I received an answer from poloniex:

 ''I have told you how the transaction information was used. I do not know whether the person who claimed the XEM is on the NEM team. I did not grant anyone permission to use public transaction info to hack this exchange.''

So its very clear all the mess created by Kodycoon and his corrupted friends protecting him here, we are going to contact BTC38 today.

He did not admit wrong doing but he carry on manipulating the fact deleting parts that show he was guilty in http://pastebin.com/ipttRjL3 but he said the parts where not really importance. Put the parts you delete it!


Between his friends starting to say he is not part of NEM and yes he is part and bla, bla bla , making it more ridiculous the situation.. Asking him how vulnerabities are in the exchanges and he replying there are lots to go thru!  Then he asked him asking to vote for him to be contiuned being affliated with NEM or no. Then patmast3r saying Kodtycoon is not affiliated with NEM in any official capacity. SO WHY KODTYCOON SAID THE BELOW:

''Look if people in nem don't want me to be affiliated with nem in anyway for any reason, that's fine. I wont be dumping any nem regardless of whether i am or not. Is that what U want cecvw? If that's what anyone wants, please speak up and I will step down "officially" if it hasn't already been assumed.''

Then patmast3r saying Kodtycoon is not affiliated with NEM in any official capacity. And kodtycoon saying he will step down "officially"

Please I demand not a public apology for stealing my NEM stake in the first place but for all the stress created here accusing Dannac and me all trolling, lies  and being the same person and also to "officially" apologies to the exchanges not Kodtycoon but Official Managers for allowing this going on for so long and do doing anything when we reported in private someone from the team or  ex team was hackening exchanges, if you continue carry on being so stubborn all you are doing is creating the end of NEM. NEM does not deserve what we have seen here the last few days, its a disgrace.

+8,999,999,999

Sorry, are you saying that reporting facts happened on the forum itself is sufficient to require a 'Clean up' of the posts ?
I'm just asking as I didn't quite understand you post. Not sure if you are referring to the requirements for a clean up or or not.

There is a big difference between reporting on facts and missrepresenting facts. You've done the latter.

Can u please make me an example so I'll report to him ?

Can someone sum up what is happening here in 5 sentences or less.

AND NOT FROM WHO IS DOING THE ACCUSING

Thank you.

Wtf is all I'm getting from this right now for gods sake

Here we go again  
cryptoknightt I strongly suggest you take your time and go back reading the previous 3-4 pages at least.
How can you found your knowledge about this case using only someone else opinion ?
Go back and read it, trust me.
It worths... it could be even funny..  
Cheers