Nice!Outstanding job!
Can't wait

My last post. I only brought out NxT because your demand to NEM dev. team is unreasonable and we need a point of comparison. It is a normal conversational technique.

But some of your Nxt guys are disgusting. First UF is TaunSew https://nxtforum.org/pub-crawl/10'000-nxt-for-speech-analysis ; Now UF is Totem22. What's next ? UF is peacefulmind? https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/651057.0 Everyone who criticizes NxT now is UF ?

Yes, I own http://nem.io (reserved for community use) -- posted it on Nem Trello board days ago and on June 13 in this very thread. Why would I be a sockpuppet, let alone CfA?

Accusations all the way, what's the matter with you?

P.S. CfA used my domain in his signature, really? what for?

Correct, http://nem.io is a placeholder for now and has been used to host the stakeholder list for my personal research -- bought it for NEM a while ago (06-01). Where is this related to sockpuppetry if you don't mind me asking?

Not sure what these sentences mean, but I can do whatever I wish with my personal sites/domains/servers as long as they are my property.

You have no shame in creating a website intended for the "community", but it's first purpose is to lie in a private message and then bait me to click it?  Only to prove I'm not UF but you then continue to ruffle through deleted posts?

Read up the definition of asocial.  Apparently you haven't have a clue from right or wrong.  No rational sane human could see your viewpoint.

If NEM community tolerates this behaviour from Instacash then we are no better than the coins we trying to overcome.

It's mostly positive.

One typo (I think):


And one inaccuracy:

I don't think it's as bad as what UF did with trolling with sock puppets You cannot take away anyone "stakes" unless they are sock puppets.

Sorry to disappoint you

As I said I only bought NxT up as a point of comparison to your demand. It is a normal discussion technique. While all comparison I made about NxT's IPO, big holder holding percentage etc. are factual and reasonable, you vehemently defended NxT, accused me of lying. You did all of that with no regard to how these discussions relate to NEM. That's not sticking to the topic.

For example: fact 1: 8 Nxt big holders out of genesis block holding 40% of Nxt. Relating point: it is fair and very reasonable that 8 NEM core developers and multiple other developers and helpers sharing 25% of NEM. I just made a very simple point. How is that not relevant ?

Show the quote? You are accusing me of writing something I did not again. This is not the first time you did that.

I have been on the sidelines for a while, just came back to catch up with NEM, so much has changed...

I requested my stake from patmast3r is he still distributing these?

I want to spread the word about NEM with a local Bitcoin club that I take part in. I am trying to figure out a way to get them interested.