Bitcointalk Mobile Browser presented by IRLBTC™

Here it is.

I built it from the latest source of the prime miner.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fhvz0awzr086g22/primeminer-x64.7z?dl=0

Quote from: BitSlapper on September 25, 2014, 03:57:39 PM

Here it is.

I built it from the latest source of the prime miner.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fhvz0awzr086g22/primeminer-x64.7z?dl=0

Thanks .....looks like requires open ssl to run....I don't have it Sad

Quote from: BitSlapper on September 25, 2014, 03:57:39 PM

Here it is.

I built it from the latest source of the prime miner.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fhvz0awzr086g22/primeminer-x64.7z?dl=0

It gives an error when I try to run it.

GPU miner will release on 10/7/2014?
WHY?
no pool,no 64bit CPU miner?
seems like kind of unfair distribution. Angry

Quote from: bitcurrenty on September 25, 2014, 04:21:20 PM

GPU miner will release on 10/7/2014?
WHY?
no pool,no 64bit CPU miner?
seems like kind of unfair distribution. Angry

There is actually one person with majortiy hashrate of network who orphans your blocks.

Now that the miner is stable, I can get to building a basic pool.

edit: As to the big miner orphaning blocks, this is no longer an issue. I am getting 40 PPS and have gotten several blocks. This situation has been resolved.
Also, the GPU miner being released 10/7 has no effect on fairness of distribution. CPU channel only releases 50% of total CSD supply, so the GPU miners will be getting their exact fair share no matter when the channel launches as they release the other 50%.

CPU Primeminer Binaries:

Windows x86
Windows x64

I'll keep everyone posted.
Viz.

Can someone confirm that the unofficial 64 bit miner is safe?

win x64 miner perfomance is the same as 32-bit, so something is wrong

I can confirm the binary is safe. I have personally tested it myself.

CPU Primeminer Binaries: Personally Verified.

Windows x86
Windows x64

Some Data on OpenSSL and 64 bit vs 32 bit: Click here for Article

"In this first test, we can see that 32-bit binaries were usually faster than 64-bit binaries, although in some cases the results were nearly identical. However, the speed difference wasn't all that great, topping out at about 12%."

You be the judge.
Viz.

64 bitary miner was slower than 32 bitary...

Read the article and data I just posted. The graph explains what you just said Grin

Now we all know.
Viz.

Weird when I run the binary on my machine I get about 2x the performance. When I add the dll's necessary for others machines to run it it drops back down to normal.

3 threads of a core i7-3770

Without ssl dll's included:

35 pps

With ssl dlls':

14 pps

of course they are installed on my machine though

Dear V,

I installed miner on Centos 6 from source. Run and Segmentation fault

[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 1924
[METERS] 18340.272727 SPS | 27.727273 PPS | Height = 1924
Segmentation fault

Rgrds,

If you are using the x64 miner on windows please try replacing this dll

https://www.dropbox.com/s/1oh6j1ioa4mfp7x/ssl%20x64.7z?dl=0

This is the x64 version of the dll installed in my windows system folder. Replacing the x86 one with this one doubled my pps.