Did this person really make an fiction chat with himself to recover trust? My god

I don't think the conversation itself is fictional. The writing styles of the 2 users are too different, and the OP is not clever enough to take that into consideration. Even if he/she was, it wouldn't matter since his/her proficiency in the English language is clearly lacking to begin with. However, he/she tried to bolster his/her image by claiming that it was him/her who spotted the scammer and that he/she singlehandedly stopped that person from performing any further malicious acts. That is obviously not true since a trusted Bitcointalk user had already exposed that scammer beforehand, a fact which was noted in the actual conversation. There was no need to doubly confirm the intentions of that scammer, and the OP did not contribute any new information to the community. Also, since we are not living in the Sesame Street universe, the scammer would obviously not stop scamming just because he/she was ordered not to do so by some random user who fancies himself/herself an online superhero. However, despite all that, the OP kept insisting that he/she had done the community a favor and deserved to have his/her slate wiped clean, which would essentially give him/her a greater latitude in attempting more half-baked scams.