Seriously? What would be hard to understand might be the technical side. But you don't need to have an idea of how it works in detail in order to use it. Maybe acquiring bitcoins could be time consuming at some cases but not hard. Bitcoin transactions on the other hand are the easiest thing ever. What would you do if you wanted to tranfer money otherwise? Go to a bank (or other money transfer service), waste your time waiting, give out your details and expect someone to handle it for you. Is that easier than copy-pasting a string of text and pressing a button? I don't think so.

well yea onename blockchain (an alt of namecoin) great idea as long as we dont need to use a website to manage the registration. due to the fact that its an altcoin, i say this because in practical terms: would people really want 2 clients running just to send bitcoin.. imagine wallet apps. thy would ned to talk to the onename blockchain to find a username. and im pretty sure that a whole onename blockchain wouldnt go onto a smartphone and be syncing all day long. hense the requirement of third party services to 'manage' it.

very soon all smartphone wallets will be just self contained raw transaction makers. no registering or being part of webwallet services. but forming the transaction right on the phone. and simply pushing out a signed TX to known PUSHtx portals/ relays nodes. thus making the smartphone also decentralised. so my thinking on the QR codes as oppose to username is based on future proofing decentralisaion. which is harder to achive if a smart phone needs to store large blockchain of onename independently (not practical) or rly on a certain web service to manage (requiring trust of service)

Alltho idea shows some interesting things, i disagree, and dont realy see the point.
If addresses are so complicated, one shouldnt even try to understand bitcoin.
I realy dont understand what is average persons IQ if they find anything here difficult.