Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.

looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)

Excuse me  "ASIC inventor"(somebody who can turn on ASIC) and "Bitcoin core developer"(somebody who is able to change constant from 1MB to 20MB). :-) You are funny,

edit:
I forgot. You are doing all this FOR NON PROFIT.

  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!  |  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!

Paging Justusranvier to explain in free-market principles pretzels how iCEBREAKER is muddled in his thinking.

you supposed engineers are stupid, aren't you?

i'll take a stab at this:  for 6 yrs we've had a small enough tx set that barely filled 1MB blocks.  now that we're starting to get closer to filling them up, spammers find it more cost effective to spam (don't have to create as many fee paying spam to fill the blocks and cause problems).  thus, their attacks start to increase in frequency. that's a problem because of the 1MB limit.

and to quote one of our trusted in thread "engineers", solex:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211

Heh, the Gavinistas are having a very bad day week.   

First, Frap.doc was put upon to explain with some semblance of logical consistency how he reaches the same pro-bloat conclusion as gavin@tla.mit.gov, despite operating on quite opposite assumptions w/r/t the financial crisis being over (now and in the med. term future).

Then came yet another face-r3kking, sig-worthy domination tweet from Jon Matonis (as if the previous from Szatoshi Backamoto weren't enough) about the utter futility of shoehorning Bitcon's square settlement peg into VisaPayPal's round payment hole:



And finally(?) Dear Leader Himself debunks hearn@google.mil and Frap.doc's attempts to ram through ill-considered hard forks using fear and mass hysteria:

Lemme try to clue you in a bit here.

Firstly, if I had a BTC for every dumbshit idea about using the blockchain as some boundless resource for messeging, timestamping, data storage system, etc, I'd be a richer man.  Even one piss-ant dice game strained it.  You don't think that VC's got cold feet when they looked past the sales pitches and saw the 1MB limit that Satoshi wisely put in?  Those who are not capable of that modest level of due-diligence lost all their money a long before they were able use it to fuck up Bitcoin.

Secondly, every one of these dumbshit ideas remains a gleam in the creator's eye and ready to pounce as soon as you crypto-socialist Gavinistas do your thing.

My own 'paracoin' idea to parasitize the subsidized data store and hitch a free ride on the Yetta-hashes as they become available.  Thankfully that idea was never needed because most of the dev team has been smart enough to fight off you bloaters for the last few years and develop against the mainchain which has yet to be destroyed.

Edit:  Oh ya, and another thing (again.)  The reason why you cannot get the 1MB filled up with coffee purchase after 6 years of trying and a lot of help from the media and regulators is this:  Bitcoin SUCKS BALLS as an exchange currency.  It is simply not competitive in this capacity and never will be.  Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but you need to come to terms with this eventually.

Problem: traffic congestion

Free market solution: build turnpikes for high-priority trips willing to pay the toll; encourage/decentralize ride-sharing for lower priority travel

Gavinista solution: put absurdly large wheels on the cars; ignore valid safety/engineering concerns contrary to GavinWheel fanboy preferences

Thanks for reminding me I forgot to include this logical technical argument in my re-cap of the Gavinista's Very Bad Day Week:


So much for the 'hurr durr cheap hard drives' (AKA argumentum ad Amazon) rational for GavinCoin.   

The way to generate resiliency for Bitcoin is to get to the point that each block generates $10M in fees.

Today each block generates around $4,500 in fees on average.

That is not resilient, that is weak and easy for any state to attack.

This idea that using fee pressure on a low # of transactions is a way to get to high value blocks from fees is absurd. The way to get to high value blocks is tons of transactions paying minimum fees.