@ ICETroll
you missed the edit at the bottom of the article linking to this tweet
Update 10:08 GMT: OKCoin has pointed out that they sent out a tweet in support of the block size limit increase in May.
https://twitter.com/OKCoinBTC/status/598412795240009728Block size increase makes #Bitcoin more efficient and enables faster confirmations. OKCoin's tech team believes it's the right decision.
You also totally misrepresent the article in your post (usual behaviour

):
both exchanges recognize that the current one megabyte block size limit is probably too small for Bitcoin to reach mainstream adoption
We believe in a gradual increase of the block size limit along with a hard upper limit to prevent misuse,
BTCChina and Huobi shared concerns that a jump to 20 megabytes might be too big, while suggesting that a more sustainable long term solution should be sought after
There is another artilce (which I am sure you won't bother to dig out, and I ma not going to do for you) where they virtually agreed to an increase to 8MB blocks.
20MB was always Gavin's opening gambit ...
#REKT ... I don't think so ...
