hey,let dumpers dump and when the price is low enough people will panic buy!

Thats correct, and he finds it an interesting concept and wants it to be part of the teleporting if bitfreak is interested. Look up the posts.

Lets get this going and mass tweet to @ramikawach & @bittrexexchange to add cryptonite! Team effort boys

Havent filled your buy orders yet have you mate? Did you realize the most innovative coin in crypto has a 33k market cap. We wont see this price again.

And why wouldnt the dev want to take part? Combine bitcoindark with cryptonite and we are unstoppable.

Now your putting my words out of context. When did I say hea frantically writing code? Why be a downer, support your coins with confidence... whats wrong with that? I think its a positive thing that james mentioned the coin and thinks it has potential

I ran into the same problem yesterday, and repeated the whole process (fresh/cleared appdata folder each time) a couple of times. At the 3rd attempt my qt effectively sync'ed past that dreaded '7 days behind' point. It seems to be related to which peers you're connecting to, but I don't really know what or why.

I'll edit this post to get you my peers list in a bit.
~ Myagui

Peers:

i agree, the scary part is that theres barely 1btc in sells stopping XCN from doubling and about 3btc stopping this from tripling. cryptonite is a monster, and with jl777 interested, its a monster waiting to erupt. 31k market cap? muahha

2% Withdrawal fee on Bter
Feels like I'm getting robbed...

What's the deal with this whole "bter code redeem" thing? I don't get the point.

Good idea, seems like a great exchange!

The telepod idea does seem very interesting, especially if the anonymity scheme it uses is better than coin mixing and ring sigs. I had a brief look at the way it works and it is pretty hard to understand, the white paper could use some diagrams. But I would be interested in seeing how compatible it is with the mini-blockchain scheme, keeping in mind that the mini-blockchain scheme does not use scripts at all and BTCD apparently has full turing complete scripting.

EDIT: ok well I think I understand it a bit better now, but I can't really understand why this isn't just a long winded way of making a normal tx. It seems to ensure that a new address will always be made for receiving payments, which is great for anonymity, but generating new addresses for receiving payments isn't exactly difficult to do without an elaborate system like this. Maybe I'm still not fully grasping the concept.

EDIT: also worth noting is that we actually discourage the use of sending coins to addresses which haven't been seen by the network before, because it increases the size of the account tree. To help prevent dust from bloating up the account tree we don't allow the output value to be lower than the tx fee if the receiving address doesn't exist in the account tree.