I typed getpeerinfo and look at the ip's:
60.162.57.53 wth?
60.162.57.53 geo-locates in China. Big surprise there! Lol! And 114.201.55.253 geo-locates in South Korea...
Not sure, but I am assuming that each port address is a different QT wallet... How many miners did Mr.Spread limit to each wallet?
addr : "114.201.55.253:51345",
addr : "114.201.55.253:52893",
addr : "114.201.55.253:55128",
addr : "114.201.55.253:56951",
addr : "60.162.57.53:16608",
addr : "60.162.57.53:21729",
addr : "60.162.57.53:2593",
addr : "60.162.57.53:2816",
addr : "60.162.57.53:28640",
addr : "60.162.57.53:28672",
addr : "60.162.57.53:30881",
addr : "60.162.57.53:31360",
addr : "60.162.57.53:32387",
addr : "60.162.57.53:3392",
addr : "60.162.57.53:34689",
addr : "60.162.57.53:35936",
addr : "60.162.57.53:37024",
addr : "60.162.57.53:38625",
addr : "60.162.57.53:43009",
addr : "60.162.57.53:43200",
addr : "60.162.57.53:47040",
addr : "60.162.57.53:48832",
addr : "60.162.57.53:51713",
addr : "60.162.57.53:52514",
addr : "60.162.57.53:53664",
addr : "60.162.57.53:54883",
addr : "60.162.57.53:58722",
addr : "60.162.57.53:60419",
addr : "60.162.57.53:61761",
addr : "60.162.57.53:61857",
addr : "60.162.57.53:63104",
addr : "60.162.57.53:7265",
addr : "60.162.57.53:8032",
I would say you just found SPR's biggest two whales! That's a LOT of wallets running on one IP...
Couldn't we prevent such a thing by simply not allowing the mining of more than one miner/port on the same IP? Should be easy to implement, right?
This should drive the investment cost for whales up quite a bit.
EDIT: No wait, getpeerinfo returns not just IPs from miners, but from wallets. So if we allowed only one wallet per IP we would run into all kinds of problems, like for example, two people in the same LAN wouldn't be able to transact with each other.
