No matter what its name is,spr is always a copycat,it can't run away from it.

FastSpread
SpreadAway
SpreadIt

It will be a huge mistake if we change the name away from masternode.  Block.  Blockchain.  Masternode.  These are terms everyone knows.  Should we call the blockchain a Spreadchain while we're at it?

PLEASE do not change the name of a technology everyone already knows.  While Mr. Spread rewrote masternode code, the idea behind it is still the same.  They're masternodes.  Evan Duffield deserves the respect of not renaming his technology AND we will be causing ourselves headaches as well.

If you change the name you're going to be explaining what a fucking Spreadnode is 400x a day.

InstantX is also a known technology that works over the masternodes.  DO NOT change the name!

Let's see if Mr. Spread decides to do anon and if he does, how he implements it before we discuss name changes there.

PLEASE put the name changes to rest for now.

We want to differentiate from darkcoin, not bitcoin.  

What if I told you that masternode is a horrible name for a cryptocurrency that stands for decentralization?

Everybody understands "blockchain", it makes sense, it's a chain of blocks. D'uh.

Everybody understands "miner", they are mining for coins like a miner in a goldmine.

But masternode? What exactly is so "master" about them?
Who are they the master of?  

I never understood that.

I think if we call our nodes something like ServerNodes then it is much more self-explanatory, right?

InstantX has to go away, we can't use that, that's a no brainer.
Should we implement an anonymization technique we should obviously also not call it DarkSend. Nobody doubts that.

But what if masternodes isn't the cool name everybody makes it look like?
Who again knows what a "masternode" is outside of darkcoin circles?

Try to view the world with the eyes of an outsider... I think calling our nodes something like ServerNodes makes everyone (even outsiders) immediately understand what those nodes do.

Servernode has the exact same problem of masternodes. Servers are centralization points, so servernode does not fit a decentralized coin either.

And then, why differentiate from DRK? it is established technology SPR is improving upon. "differentiating" from it in name only while keeping the similarities in functionality is just to sweep the dirt under the carpet.

But wait, the whole internet is based on servers.
Something that is decentralized is based on centralized entities.

That's not a problem, you can built decentralized systems based on centralized entities.

And everybody knows what a server is.

I don't want Spreadcoin to have similarities in functionality with darkcoin for all eternity!
I hope that in the future we will walk more and more our own path, until one day we are practically unrecognizable from what we are today.

Or what, you imagine a future where we walk behind darkcoin forever?  

Not in my dreams!

What about Spreadnodes and something maybe along the lines of SpreadInstaSend or SIS for short I dunno I definitely like Spreadnodes for the masternodes naming and I am totally open to any ideas about what to call the instant sending..... uh oh InstaSpread lol That's it InstaSpreading I like it

SmoothSpread
SupercalifragilisticexpeiallidousiousSpreadSuperSend
LOL