Usukan,
The length of your test does not account for your work in those pools that have not hit a block. I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp. I'll watch your address and report back. Was that address solely dedicated to the test? I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address. And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.
I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing. I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right. I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:
libs/profitData.js, line 570
coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) (1 * 1000 * 1000));
coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;
The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day. The value is actually per day, not per hour.
Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding. Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.
Anoncoin 10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675
Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO. It pays out around 750UTC for the block reward at current prices:
Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q 619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR 113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp 2729.77701524000001143UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1 339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy 28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB 129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE 90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG 107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa 107.03654302999999954
As you can see you have the lions share in there. You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.
Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable. It's not going to be instant gratification. I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time. The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.
I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit. I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.
Kracko
Could you check the Tumblingblock main page
"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."
I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour
It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jspIt makes a huge difference.
Cheers
Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi
Cost was 0.16 BTC
Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)
I lost 0.116 BTC
so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day). There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that. As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss? How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?
Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.
But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.
Ultracoin Multipool UpdateI've added some new coins, and re-added others.
New- 42 (scrypt)
- Saffroncoin (sha256)
- Saffroncoin (scrypt)
- Saffroncoin (x11)
Re-added- Fireflycoin (sha256)
- Crypt (x11)
- Darkcoin (x11)
And I am planning to add these soon:
Near future- Digibyte(Sha256d)
- Digibyte(Scrypt)
- Earthcoin
- Franko
And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started. Not bad for a beta-testing group. Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile. I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section. There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.
I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block. That's beyond the patience of most people. I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each. Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout. I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.
If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them. I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy. For the next few weeks I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.
Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in. We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.
