I believe you're doing that just to prove a point.

BUt here's a little extra proof, just from the last few days.

https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/732330.0
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/734984.0
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/239813.0
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/6503.0
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/731185.0
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/726063.0

And if you search, you owill find post suspecting the same thing very far back

Because people keep making the same exact thread, with little to no variation on the content.

People are creating posts about the same exact subject without searching to check whether or not a similar thread was created. Someone with multiple accounts kept making topics on the subject with no credible information, and would reply to his own threads often times trying to sell an e-book that cost upwards of 200 United States Dollars from Amazon.

This is an original idea and has never been posted before. N00b

I have seen several threads on this topic recently. I would not be surprised if some of them have been moved to a different subforum and would likely get a new topic number so if you go directly to the link it will show as you are unable to access the link.

Oh, I wonder why? Maybe because there is at least one of these posts every few days. Until there is some real evidence, one thread is enough. Join the discussion on an existing thread or keep it to yourself please.

It's true there is evidence of NSA working on cryptocurrency technology with their 1996 paper on cryptos. However, my theory is Satoshi is an individual or group of people that worked for the government and secretly released the technology to the public.

Or it could be a big setup from the beginning. But isn't fiat anyway? At least with Bitcoin it's open source and public and everyone knows exactly how many there are. If there is a backdoor to the encryption then people will switch to something else.

+1 love that idea

Its interesting to note Gavin Andresen has never met "Satoshi" or spoken to him on the phone.  It reminds me of exactly how Edward Snowden first contacted Glenn Greenwald without revealing his identity, and Snowden had CIA background.  Also makes sense that the CIA would not worry about holding a million or so BTC, thats just a drop in the bucket for them.  Really makes you think...

I've heard that Bitcoin talks were banned at defcon this year via orders from high up in the organization, and vendors were instructed not to accept Bitcoin.

That's not the kind of rules I'd expect at the CIA's and NSA's most important recruiting event if Bitcoin was their project.