also most the 'litecoin is dead' types can be traced back to monero supporters threads
...
In fact I'm quite certain that the idea of Litecoin being in fact headed for zero, and the discussion of the idea widely on this forum, pre-dates Monero's existence by a fair bit.
...
Yup. Take me for example. I've derided 99% of alts for years. I'm on record since well before Monero ranting about how Litecoin brings nothing to the table, and how the tweaks vs Bitcoin (supply, conf time, mining alg) are all meaningless in practice. Now that the meaninglessness of the tweaks is well understood, all Litecoin has left is this notion of a "back up" to Bitcoin. That one may actually have slight merit, but IMO, not one justifying a top-5 position.
Ever since Zerocash/coin was theorized a few years ago, I've thought that protocol-level privacy would be a niche that an alt-coin could fill, since Bitcoin would probably never implement it directly. Monero is the first coin to come along (with a reasonable launch) that can fill that niche, hence my assertion that it can attain decent market-cap in the alt space, and specifically that a more rational crypto market would likely price it higher than Litecoin.
I think there are a lot of people (especially those of us who correctly saw Bitcoin's value early on) on here who have a similar analysis; hence kelsey's feeling that Monero supporters don't like Litecoin. He's getting the causality mixed up, but there may be a correlation (not causation).