Thanks, makes sense. Very interested to see how the SuperTraders perform, given their bankroll and bonuses. Hopefully we can get running totals from them?
Further thought on probabalistic routing - layman's response as ever so add NaCl as required:
If a node's send list is based on the nodes from which it has previously received packets, is there scope for certain routes to be reinforced in the long term? Put simply, routes that have worked in the past are likely to work again and therefore be used again. Of course, this is all mitigated somewhat by the randomness included, but still, over time a given node may develop a strong preference for another node as a recipient of choice.
I'm unclear whether this would actually happen in practice, or whether if it did, that preferred node could then become a target for attack. In any case, a solution would be to decrement the counter for an address whenever it is used to send to, so it is not sent to next time.
Quick thought:
sharkfund0 and SuperTraders will both be (independently?) involved in SuperNET. Does this mean they will effectively be in competition?
sharkfund0 is not very active anymore and has a relatively static portfolio that is a proxy for Teleport
occasionally I might make a long term change, like sell off 1% BBR to buy 10% BTM and then sell off 1% BTM to buy back all the BBR that was sold

i dont expect such things to be any regular thing moving forward.