That is the story I was reading, that gave me the
theory about dorian satoshi nakamoto and hal finney creating bitcoin.
I just found it odd that they used their real names.
It also seems very obvious that these two fellows lived in the same small town/city of 30,000 people, and if any of you ever lived in a small town like that, you would realize that these two guys easily could have known each other.
It seems obvious that these two fellows created bitcoin.
Another theory:
It seems to indicate that someone else created bitcoin, but used satoshi nakamoto's and hal finney's names when they did that?But who would do that, and why would they scapegoat satoshi nakamoto and hal finney?
Ok, so it makes more sense to me, that we consider theories that explain why these two high trained persons may have used their real names to create bitcoin; or why would others scapegoat or use their names to create bitcoin?
Why might they point the finger at themselves?
Or, why might others point the finger at them?
you do realize that the satoshi nakamoto or hal finney accounts may have been compromised?(maybe those accounts were used by someone else? not by those people?)
that the info provided by those accounts might not be true?
I noticed how most people think that those accounts tell the truth always?
So then, attempting to discern the truth, requires reading between the lines then, doesn't it?
(
not 'conspiracy'.
Reading between the lines. )