As you might see from the website, Jasin is no longer listed as a team member in an official capacity. So, no.

On the other hand we are regularly in touch with him, he contributes to discussions over Skype, and we continue to have every expectation that his ASIC problems will be resolved in due course.

So please remove the word "XC" from the title. After all, why is there a good reason to target XC here?

Uh, both are awful.


Huh? In what world is it necessary to read the entire Fibonacci thread? I've asserted that I read the bits where things went wrong, that is, the relevant bits.

So I did review the entire situation. Not that I have any sort of executive capacity, and not that I consider myself required to. But I did anyway.

I consider myself well-informed on this topic.

And, being well-informed, I consider your actions brutally unethical.

Umm, old document.

I have stated my view explicitly above.

I will be happy to tie all the dots together on why it is toxic to have someone who has misrepresented the truth over and over again involved in a closed source anon coin project since what seems like and obvious problem to me seems to confuse the XC team.  But my goal is not a scam accusation about asics.  It is a warning about jasins involvement in projects where his ethics will cost investors money.

I did as you requested with the title.  I will rephrase the stuff about him writing fresh anon messaging and currency stuff into another coin.  It does seem like a terrible conflict of interest to me since your investors rely on closed source code Jasin has access to.  

Perhaps then you should mention all the projects Jasin is associated with, rather than just XC.

But since Jasin has no executive influence over XC's course, since he has no control over the premine, and since he has not created any of XC's current technology, Jasin therefore could not turn XC into a scam/fraud if he tried. Therefore I ask that you remove mention of XC from this thread's title.

Is Jasinlee an "XC developer"?

Fair point. You're right that I've done something unorthodox.

My reasons for it are as follows:

- Whether Jasin is officially an XC dev or merely associated with XC, his reputation affects XC. So I can't really separate them much.

- This thread is clearly an attack on XC (cf. the title).

- In my personal capacity I strongly object to scam accusations that lack solid justification.

If you could include this in the op even as a direct qoute I will be extremely happy:

- You can not guarantee that people will loose many because Jasin is involved ( in a small capacity, chatting on skype currently)
         - Our core community is aware of this situation and has expressed their opinon, none of them have dumped or a dumping because of Jasin.

- He's not in position of power.
         - He has no access to any of the funds like the premine
         - He can't dictate what the team does or who works for XC

- Jasin's involvement with cachecoin was public

- Blockchain 2.0 and POBOC ('Interchains') was public and we released that we will be working with Cache on this
           -Currently this in very very early stages

- Anon features were a part of Cache, we addressed the fact that the implementation was different. We never tried to hide the fact that Cache had Anon features. In fact we even discussed it with members. Although these features seem similar they have nothing to do with XC.

- This means that most people knew about nearly every detail of cache and the collab with XC

- You cannot prove that Jasin is stealing any code. As you said this your gut feeling.
        - None of the current tech published by XC was created by Jasin


Also if you a serious about this put a disclaimer that currently you have published no proof. You might have some, I have no idea if you do but currently you haven't put anything out.

Is Jasinleee and XC developer? Yes or no? In what way is he "associated" with XC?
Talking to people in discussions on skype does not make someone "associated" with XC.
Come on...you need to make some unambiguous statements about this. Be clear.