i agree that comments and ratings are both pretty critical as some sort of filtering system!!! Rusty i know crypto is generally full of pond scum who will run with your bitcoin given half the chance!! Pavel is still here and this coin is obviously going places!! He has his word and his name backing it. To many people this is better than having a large financial stake. If he dissapears his word and name will be shit. So let him get on with the important and lets get this show on the highway!!!
Where and why would he ever want to leave. The basics behind the coin are already in place and working. If I were the dev and had control over the ADtx income and have a knowing that this coin could rise and stabilize in the 10k's to 100k 's over the course of adoption just over the next few months - I'd be a moron to jump ship.
CraigsCoin has more application potential behind it than 99% of the other coins out there - adoption takes time though.
Hopefully, ADtx will not only fund dev(s) future projects but be given out as dividends to investors as well
As "whalebone" has mentioned before, it would be nice in the future if Pavel explained a more precise layout of the ADtx wallet. Just imagine how stabilized the price would be if investors learned that they can earn coins from POS on top of possible dividends from ADtx. I think this is the solution that BTC has been looking for all along - STABILITY!
Yes. We need all to think about that. I don't mind sharing ADtx fees with investors, we just need to figure out how. Any ideas?
Automatically burn the transaction fees and now holders have a rising % of the outstanding coins. At the end of the day it works out the same as a dividend.
I'm not entirely sure that it is possible, because there may be very big amount of holders with very different amount of money, and basically it will add enormous amount of transactions every time AD posted. General idea is good, but we need to think how to implement it.
I'm not sure what that has to do with burning the transaction fees. Can't they just be sent to a burn address?
Burning coins is just ugly IMO. I thought about that before but then realized that with "burning" ads coin cap is 6 000 000 Ads. Burning not an option. Re circulation - is.
Ok, I can see the problem now. But, it's only a problem if the fee is always fixed amount and isn't that a problem in itself? Eventually the cost of an ad will be too high, no?
Yes dynamic vanishing fee was another option in the very beginning, but then following will occur:
1. Coins still will be vanishing
2. ADtx fee will be dynamic in two different dimensions. Right now ADtx fee actual price depends on a market price. If it will be diminishing - it will also be fluctuating relating to market price. That will make nearly impossible to predict ADtx behavior. Also no matter of how small it is coin supply will be still diminishing with, asymptotically trending to zero.
3. Total amount of coins will remain the same because there is no way to actually "destroy" the coin. All you can do is create wallet and delete wallet.dat, so there always will be some degree of doubt that it actually was deleted.
