You know everything. He never mentioned anonymity being lost.


Well I am sure you are sure. And so we can stop now.

You know everything.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

When bitcoin was in its infancy and experiencing some of its first bug exploits do you think Satoshi was whining about not getting payed, how the project wasn't his whole life and he rather spend time on the beach with his wife? As core developers you are suppose to believe in the project so much that you see the extreme potential and the coins you hold on to from the beginning will eventually be worth so much that it will compensate you for all your hard work.

Trolling 101:
This is the message you can send if you get any response.
If you don't get a response, keep going, but add that they are unresponsive and uncaring.
Cycle as needed.

Your mathematicians didn't address that r_s = q_s - c_sx mod l is also known, where _qs is unknown.

Sorry I know you know everything.

q_s is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

Anonymint edited his post, so I had to address the edit.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis, and it wasn't based on any need to know nuances about a complex technical issue.

dear god.  can we just setup a webcam so you guys can whip them out and see who's is bigger & drop the facade?

geez