great job on the wallet! so, next we get incentives.tech-co.in in wallet

I have not yet gotten around to updating the Linux pro file or the Linux documentation.

You will need to add "QT += webkit" to the pro file.

You also may need to install QtWebKit (apt-get install libqt5webkit5-dev)

Hope this helps.

Putting it in a line by itself near the top should work.  When compiling on Mac I added it directly below QMAKE_CXXFLAGS = -fpermissive at the bottom of the first group of code.

Hmm..you can try QT += WebKit webkitwidgets in the pro file.  Will try and compile in Linux tomorrow if I can and figure it out.

It worked for me in Ubuntu and I have updated the Linux documentation and pro file in the github accordingly.  However, I built the wallet using Qt4.  If you're using Qt5 you most likely need to edit the line in the pro file to say:

QT += webkit webkitwidgets

then re-run qmake on the profile and make.

Hope this helps!

Congratulations, TECH is out from Bittrex!  

Message from Allcrypt:

"Deposits and withdrawals will be delayed. No new blocks have been received in 12 minutes. Average block time for the last 250 blocks has been 6.05 minutes."

so TECH is on allcrypt? thats better than nothing I don't get a lot of the technical jargon like coding... etc but I can tell that you guys have put a lot of effort in to TECH since the take over and it's a shame we haven't been able to get any real momentum yet. 

 The other day I read "the story of bob surplus" and it was a real eye opener for me, I have never been a part of a pump group so before I was only going off my presumptions of how they work etc.  reading the post and reflecting on the last year I've been in crypto it came really obvious how much they influence... not just their group but any day trader trying to make a buck, they follow wherever the spotlight is pointing that day/week  (right now they seem to be moving from xpy to sbit)  so any solid coin that isn't associated with them has a heck of a time getting noticed... and being such a low number of coins and the bad start thanks to the ditching dev TECH is bound for an up hill climb.

  I will keep my wallet staking as long as there is a market open for TECH, if anyone gets any good ideas and need some help please don't hesitate to ask me. I'm not a coder or anything but will help were I can

I actually do not see the Bittrex delisting as a negative at this point.

Bittrex requires 1.4 BTC worth of volume every two weeks to prevent coins from being delisted, and they very rarely make exceptions and manually override the automated scripts they have in place to purge their markets.  I know this because I have communicated with them directly.  They don't even take a break for the holidays when many people are occupied with things outside of crypto (TECH was flagged for possible removal right around Christmas, and delisted the day after New Year's).  For months we have been creating this volume to prevent the coin from being delisted in the hopes that a community would build and attract investors and a real market, but this has not happened, and it hasn't been due to a lack of effort from us.  Since TECH was taken over this summer, the world of crypto has changed drastically.  BTC prices are in the toilet, mining in general returns a negative ROI, and investors are focused on massive, ambitious coin projects backed by full-time dev teams and millions in USD raised through ICOs or some other form of income, such as GAW's PayCoin.  There's no way that we can compete with that, and maintaining the Bittrex market on our own has become unfeasible for us.  I would even argue that it had become a liability, effectively turning TECH into nothing more than a biweekly PnD.  It is time to reevaluate what TECH is, what it can be, and where it can go.  Some of this (active development, PR) is in our direct control, but a great deal of it, mainly the general state of crypto, is not.

TECH is not dead.  The dev team is still active, we have a working coin with a functioning blockchain (although admittedly POS block generation is at times slower than we would like, community growth and more staking would help that), and we have a good working market for trading with AllCrypt (with BTC, LTC, and DOGE markets) with volume requirements that are more reasonable for our community to maintain at this time.  Bittrex re-listing in the future is always a possibility if volume at other exchanges grows and/or they hear enough from the community via Twitter, but it is not a necessity in our view, especially right now.

The Crypto ID block explorer has been updated with Allcrypt, thanks fairglu.
P.S. I also asked if he would add the expiration date for the community as well.