he said a while back (before growth) that he had .1 seed
You sir are mistaken... and wrong as usual. I have never posted if I do or not have any SEED. I don't believe it is of any relevance since I have explained, many times already, that my "interest" in this project is related to the fact that the entire dev team of PINK has thrown out any credibility the may have had for supporting, promoting and sponsoring this debacle, as well as tainted in an irreparable way, the good name of PINK, in which I hold a modest investment.
So let me get this right. You are holding your "modest investment" of pink, solely based on the credibility and reputation of the devs.... which by the way is "tainted and irrepairable" and simply "thrown out" the window. So then Im assuming you are still holding on to them because of the technology developed for pink? Surely that cannot be true... you yourself think they are unnecessary and should've just let it be. But what about the code? Gasp! We did not come forth openly until it we were "caught" by jyap that is was a "hack job/copy/paste" (that you so often repeat like a broken record in every post
) of Novacoin. Surely, this is unacceptable right? I mean... all the people in the dev team knew all along from even before the take over that it was a novacoin "hack job/copy/paste" (i love repeating that too... makes me feel all informed like
And charity? Pfft... you dont seem to think there's any "focus" on that these days right? And its also "the gambling coin" or something right? A phrase you coined and insist its now popularly known by that new name, yet cant for the life of me find anyone (other than you) referring to it like that. So then since you are all facts and logic and high school math n stuff, there really is no incentive to be invested in pink right? I know you mentioned something about your exit from pink as imminent or something of the sort. Seriously... how long do we have to wait? You don't think pink is going to "get better" or something do you? Your posts definitely is a testament to that. So what then? Is it a means to justify your presence here? Each time someone asks what your intentions are, you conveniently parrot your "modest investment" of pink, and connect that as "reason" here... pretending like as if you are making up your mind to judge the quality of the devs to protect your "modest investment".
Of late, I'm noticing you clinging on to meaningless phrases like "supporting, promoting and sponsoring" and repeating them like those brainwashing tapes playing in loop. "Supporting" and "promoting" is more or less the same when it comes to the small world of alt coins. I know it can mean something completely different outside that world. I just cant figure out what the whole "sponsoring" is all about. Are you saying we're paying cryptzo to continue developments for the coin? If that makes sense to you, please elaborate. If it doesnt, do give the source where you came across such info. If its a theory, why are you conveniently not mentioning that and passing it off as facts? You, after all "call it as it is" I believe.
It is completely pointless to pretend that you would "get this right". I have already shown you proof, copy/pasted from this forum, of the vocal desertions from Pink of at least one poster. Fact enough for you of the "tainting" of PINK because of the "sponsorship, support and promotion" of SEED by the Pink dev team? Of course not. I would need and official declaration by the United Nations, the ONU and the European Counsel to that effect... and you would still cling to the silence from the Soviet Union and China... and even if they would also sign, you would cling to Japan. Or North Korea.
There's a significant difference between "Supporting" and "Promoting" in this small world too. Of course you need clarification. Gladly: "Supporting" would be the equivalent to tell people something like "hey guys, a personal friend of one of our devs, sumyge, is launching a new coin and we believe you could be interested. We support the project and will invest in it". Or words to that effect. "Promoting": Is telling the same things ... constantly or frequently.
Since you seem to have some comprehension difficulties -or lack of vocabulary, or both- I will add that "sponsoring" is, besides the former two, being actually involved in the project, "helping" as it were, in whatever capacity ... including acting as the escrow in the ICO.
I hope this clarifies enough the language shortcomings in your understanding.
Now for my involvement in PINK, I have been involved since Danny revamped it as something quite different of what it is now. I have explained to you, many times already, that I am a trader and that I have been trading PINK for months. But I also wrote both THE WALL of SHAME and THE WALL OF HONOR. And, in my limited research, I haven't found yet any other coin -other that the PINK that Danny revamped, in the beginning, NOT the current one by any stretch of imagination- deserving its listing in THE WALL OF HONOR. Such inclusion means, for whatever it is worth, my recommendation. And my credibility. And I put very high marks on those. So, independently of what my position is at the moment in Pink, I have the self-imposed obligation of telling the people that read THE WALL OF HONOR that the current PINK is something very different that the PINK I listed there and that remains the ONLY one ever listed.
I know that for you this would be difficult to understand, for it has to do with integrity and honesty, but it is all there's to it.
Edit to add: Oh and that ends my communication with you at any level, by the way. I would not stoop to your level or that of that thing above you in the posting scale. To each his own.
