 |
January 12, 2018, 04:25:50 PM |
|
HTMLCOIN Aside panic. We intend to comply with all future rules and regulations on cryptography and securities. In fact, we view the Fund as a software company. We create and mainaint software that is used to launch decentralized blockchain and all its functions. The Fund does not sell anything and has no relation to the activities of the Treasury.
As I said, the base does not depend on prices on the exchanges, but to create great software to encourage OD implementation of decentralized blockchain technology. Our approach is more than a coin platform as long as we are not looking for projects to land in our circuit, the start marker to generate business for themselves..... what we do using the value transfer (bitcoin) blockchain opportunity to drive a very wide (horizontal) adoption in both commercial and private use. This is what the program is about POMA.
To the extent that, as we grow the base implementation of a simple-to-use technology with a desktop computer and soon to arrive mobile wallets, we have a community of users who can start using the blockchain for other things. These things will use DAP, smart contracts, and other technologies to provide a richer and more damaging (vertical) solutions.
Why we adhere to this approach ?
Speed, pace and relevance. What we observed is a lot of great platforms that grow, which are then placed projects, which, it seems, must have its own user base. Projects don't seem to relate to users of the block chain...... what we are confused. The blockchain is not like the cloud computing platform is a community that decided to use a decentralized platform transmission cost, which can supply decentralized applications (relevant to their worlds)
What's holding us back ?
This is a personal opinion and not the official line. At the moment we have to regroup and focus on the features and growth. We (the core team) must consider the broader picture with a complete economic model of growth and acceptance, and to construction. We have full time developers on the team, and POMA has been in development for a long time, so the challenge for us is appropriate and establshing campaigns.
Are there any blockers. Now I don't think so. Let's see how far we've come since we started in September. I think the biggest problem Zingel is an industry, and his arrival likely regulation. We take very seriously the recent decisions of the SEC, as well as treasuries, which are an important part of the ECO-system. This means that the community must behave in an exception for us to get on the list. In exchnages we turned to look, and carrying them for business solutions based on our innovation projects, our likely growth, the health of our coins (stable and non-pumped) and the quality/participation in achieving our intended goal of mass implementation of the blockchain.
What are the key risks ? personally:
1. We support good regulation, but not regulation that hinders decentralized blockchain.
2. The dominance of bitcoin and its politk. For me, it casts a shadow across our inidustry. Bitcoin has no roadmap, strategy and architectural consensus. I mean, they still haven't launched the original white paper of Satoshi. The constant struggle and technical policy destroy value, destroy the environment and make us fools. As an Alt-coin, the influence of bitcoin is that it destabilizie the adoption of alternative and better technologies, while people looking for free money and move in/out of it.
3. Time and workload.
You will see a lot from this team, more than is warranted by its size. We have and use an extensive network of friends and developers teams, but no matter what we do, you guys want him last week, and if we could slip out for a few days, we know that you'll be frustrated. But, this software development, and we are the team with the delivery of the software. It is what it is and it takes as much time as you need. Quality is everything ! Don't panic! be calm! ...Your Russian support team.
|
