Dear Electronic Frontier Foundation,
The Bitcoin community appreciates your efforts protecting Internet freedom, and keeping the Internet free of unneeded regulatory intervention.
Today's Bitcoin community comprises approximately N enterprises and indiviuals, using a new open-source P2P cryptocurrency system called Bitcoins <https://bitcoin.org> that is published under the MIT license.
Several members of our community have asked to donate Bitcoins to your Foundation, with xxx Bitcoins being pledged so far. We are certain that you will receive many more in individual donations if you will set up an EFF Bitcoin node.
Warmest regards,
The Bitcoin Community.
1 google result: "unneeded regulatory intervention"
18,400 google results: "unnecessary regulatory intervention"
~23,000 google results: "* regulatory intervention" -"of regulatory intervention"
thus, "unnecessary regulatory intervention" seems most relevant/useful ("of regulatory intervention" being most common of all "* regulatory intervention" results)
bef: unneeded regulatory intervention
aft: unnecessary regulatory intervention
Today's Bitcoin community comprises approximately N enterprises and indiviuals, using a new open-source P2P cryptocurrency system called Bitcoins <https://bitcoin.org> that is published under the MIT license.Does this mean that the community is comprised by using a new open source P2P cryptocurrency system? This sentence seems strange.
bef: have asked to donate
aft: have offered to donate
Did we really ask? Who was asked?
246,000 google results: "We are certain that you will"
1,660,000 google results: "We are confident that you will"
bef: We are certain that you will
aft: We are confident that you will
0 google results: "receive many more in individual donations"
0 google results: "receive many more individual donations"
7 google results: "receive many individual donations"
See search results for "receive many * donations" for some ideas on how to reword this.
Perhaps even "receive many * donations" is not useful either. Any ideas?