author=_mr_e link=topic=829576.msg9690116#msg9690116 date=1417272189]
I now see where all the FUD has been coming from as of late. I totally don't understand why you just said that statement. I know a lot of folks involved with the SuperNEt project and they would call you a variety of words for saying that. I think both techs understand the importance of coexisting and each offers their own way. Grow up.
I would fully agree with you if this was actually a legitimate tech. Even if it was, the benefits to the investor is far greater with supernet given that it is backed by actual holdings and will produce a multitude of revenue streams that are all to be shared with investors. This is nothing more then friendly advice to people to do some serious research on these two projects and determine which investment will give you the greatest chance of returns.
Most especially take a look at the actual code repos before you make that decision. I think you will be surprised to find a massive difference. That chart above is nothing but hot air that could take 10 min to type up.
Let's not forget...
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/841223.0.
Supernet started before Blocknet, it's unfair to make a comparison.
Also the last time I checked, Supernet was 10 times higher in market cap than Blocknet. Which would account for the current differences between the projects.
If Dan and the team delivers the tech as promised, then Block will offer greater returns. The difference in price reflects the market consensus of the likelihood of Dan and the team delivering. The FUD screwed that up because I can tell you, Dan delivered a ton of high quality tech for XC and he is a skilled coder and man manager.
Supernet holders would do well to hedge their risk by investing in Blocknet IMO.