I wasn't going to chime in on this, but...
People need to get over themselves. The crypto 'verse is big enough for all coins to coexist without shitting on
one another. That being said, the 25 x 500k transactions that are all EXACTLY 500k and all EXACTLY the same
age is fishy.
The only actual FACT in this whole fiasco is that those coins exist (or existed since they appear to have been
destroyed). Everything else is speculation. Was it a hidden premine? I honestly don't know. CANN devs were
saying that they had no knowledge of the coins and didn't know who they belonged to.
Okay...maybe that's true. So please, CANN devs, answer me this:
- How do you not notice 25 identical transactions on the blockchain that all occurred at the same time?
- If these were not your coins, how were you able to find the private keys and access the addresses to be
able to destroy the coins?
I am not a coindev, so for all I know, maybe there is a rational explanation. If so, I would like to know.
For those of you whargarrrbling about CCN having hired a PR firm to FUD CANN - the only person who claims
to have actual FIRST HAND knowledge (not "I heard that..." or "so and so told me...") of this is a sockpuppet
account created TODAY with 2 posts to its name. Adding the moniker _Snowden to your nick? That just smacks
of trying too hard to troll.
No coin needs to shit on another to succeed. It makes crypto as a whole look bad when that happens. Who
the hell is going to want to invest something that, at the moment, resembles nothing so much as a bunch of
angry monkeys flinging poo at one another?
Oh yeah, one more thing - using big ass fonts doesn't give you any more credibility than normal size fonts.
It just irritates more people.
Just sayin'...
