Using the term 'bit' to refer to 1/1000000 of a Bitcoin is by no means a Generally Accepted Concept.
sure it is! blockchain.info and qt wallets both allow you to view your balance in BITS already.
Yes, wallets can already 'display balances as BTC and BITS ex. 3.1BTC and 238903BITS'. Get coding.
i only saw wallets that either display in bits or BTC, never both, maybe thats the best approach just throwing an idea out there.
Incidentally, the 'official' wallet already has a user-settable option to display in BTC, mBTC, or uBTC.
yes, i see that, and thats good, but what does it default to? when i send a payment and i want to send it in BTC but my Qt or blockchain wallet is set to bits, will i need to go into the setting and then send my BTC payment out and then set it back to bits ? thats a bitch, wallets need to be able to switch from BTC BITS on the fly, as i am about to make a payment, some sites will quote prices in BTC some in BITS, needs to be fast and easy to switch back and forth when making a payment.
I'm not dropping mBTC. You can if you want. I recognize that I have no ability to force your behavior.
As a passing comment, I note that humans already have an issue with 6 decades of dynamic range. Introducing new units to reduce from 8 decades to 6 (i.e. 'Satoshis' to 'uBTC' or 'bit'), without an intervening unit (i.e. 'mBTC'), accomplishes very little.
if we all just leave this up in the air, no standards defined anywhere, let everyone do their own thing, and hope it all sorta works out in the end, its going to get really messy and hard to work with... how do i pay a site that prices things in mBTC when my blockchain wallet doesn't even have a setting for mBTC??? ( if you think its no problem just multiply it by 10 and you get the BTC amount, then your voting that we simply accept the way things are and make due... we can do better -_- ) we need to think about these thing, discuss them, draw out some
standards, maybe drop mBTC because it just making things just that much more complicated.