even worse. lack of transparency.

No it's just a short shitty shill story from GAW, submitted by some PR person that Josh hired. Pretty hilarious if you ask me.

Oh and the GAW members are actively shilling in the comment sections. Go figure 

A shill posting about shilling. Go figure 

OK, let's do this...
I was mislead by Mr. Garza on more than one occasion dating back to late June, 2014; both on video chat and online -
I was flat out lied to by Mr. Garza on more than one occasion via email dating back before August, 2014, and up until at least late October, 2014 -
I was attacked legally by Mr. Garza via his [unaware of the facts] lawyer AFTER I had already filed a federal compliant in late October - and he knew it (which in itself is a federal offense) -
I was stolen from in the form of lost BTC value in excess of US$1000 when my account withdrawal was locked for over a business week by GAW/Zen for no offered nor given reason back in September, 2014 -

...and I have been publicly crucified by Mr. Garza and his small group of identifiable followers for simply exposing his ethical shortcomings and business falsities he continues to project on almost a daily basis - just to name a few.

So, care to answer my original question now?

Scott-

So now its Hashstaker....wtf happened to Hashbase or is that facing one of the usual inevitable delays  

Paycoin, Hashcoin, Hashbase, Hashstaker...mwuhahahahahahhaha

The egotistical GAW_CEO should stick his face on the next coin he releases to really give me a good ol' belly laugh.

@elkrisi
These frustrated guys just ignored your facts and keep comenting about the suposed scam, which, for now, it has everything to turn out a very legit business!
That said, and the fact coinfire DIDN'T provide any kind of PROOF about the statements from Walmart Target Amazon, along with their poor written "article" and no sources added regarding the merchants, that is a lie.

Again, this frustrated guys, are just FUD'ING trying to make paycoin a fail... Again, JUST Trying.

i'll reiterate, anything which smells remotely like government funding, should be kept at an arms length.

so, my deduction is that he is not actually funding anything, but giving the impression that he has given money to the project, to enable him to take a reap of the rewards of the scam?


provably unfair on investors.