I'm trying to digest all of this with the coin fire article. Before we break open a bottle of Champaign, Is there any chance of inaccuracies? or is there any facts to support the "facts" as described in the article? Just playing the devils advocate for a moment, as we all know there is and will be skepticism from many fronts until we read or see more on the investigation if we can dare call it that. I guess I am waiting to see more than the snippets posted in article... albeit well written. Just hope its all accurate and true
PS: ok, Don't throw eggs at me lol
Absolutely,
No one should open a bottle. This is going to be a long running thing and will take time. This is merely the beginning. They have documents they are putting together to determine if it warrants any sort of major investigation.
One of our sources even ended with a remark that now is the time to submit information or else more resources won't be spent on this.
We hope to bring more of the document in the future. Right now the bulk of it is just things people have sent in. That said some of them have been given directly to our sources so we are trying to be careful about what we release in the meantime.
Ok, I hear ya, you make a good point with this one statement:
One of our sources even ended with a remark that now is the time to submit information or else more resources won't be spent on this.All seems to be solid from all you presented. Yes a long road, but if so then it will most certainly bring down the curtain, and rightfully so.
Thanks for the reply. Understood, keep it up! see where this leads
