I appreciate what you are saying, but with all due respect, I do not pay for my news or to review content that is already within the public domain -> with the exception of legally privileged material, which was the basis for my original enquiry for clarification. All I am getting at is be careful. Activities that could potentially lead to an obstruction of justice can unwind a lot of work invested up to this point and also cloud up the waters of an otherwise solid case.

Just my 0.03 XPY's worth.

Scott-
 

To even state how we obtained it would jeopardize our sources.

How is it baiting this thread when each time we've made such a statement we have published a story regarding the documents?

Edit: We won't be publishing on this message board any further. Our reporting will simply stand for itself.

I think the question is valid without criticizing the reporting you have done on your site.

perhaps, but I think the question being avoided is why would anyone outside of the chain of custody involving evidence collected by a government entity have access consistently and repeatedly when no one else does ?

Please do note here when you've published a new story.

I am glad to have information keep flowing even if it is the Hashking himself.  I can judge whether to believe it or not.

WTF?


P.S: I have looked at a couple of the small transactions from the "5,000,000 XPY security wallet" and they both lead to exchanges. Check for yourself, follow block 91713 and they start doing the scam dance and then eventually lead to exchanges. Here is the "security wallet":  https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?232492.htm

It's refreshing to meet someone that's polite.  Thank you for that, regardless of which side of this you might be on.

I hope they won't delete my good suggestions

http://picpaste.com/pics/Untitled-lOl1xiMm.1425963809.jpg

https://hashtalk.org/topic/33375/coinfire-some-suggested-articles-for-you/

http://picpaste.com/pics/Untitled-lOl1xiMm.1425963809.jpg

not interested in outing the guys personal information. not really my place either, to be honest. i've had a conversation with him in PMs regarding this a few weeks ago and he just stopped responding after throwing a mild tantrum. I told him I would not publicly post the information, so I'm going to stick with that for now. I don't think he's doing anything truly malicious, other than generating pageviews to his blog.

people can do their own research and believe into what they choose to believe. if anyone is interested enough and the least bit knowledgeable in such areas it's pretty simple to get it though.