Yeah the possibilities are nearly endless. Heck just for example...
Let's say we use the same advertising idea for employment!
The employers and employee's reputation status would help employers looking for employees or employees looking for employers. The top rated of each would receive the best offers to choose from.
It would be like a domino effect.

Heck with a little coding we could crosschain the system.
Let's say you are an employer that owns only BitBay.
You only use BitBay's employment market to outsource your workload demand.
Yet for what ever reason, you have no luck finding anybody on BitBay's market for your employment contract. You decide to check out BitHalo and notice that there are quite a lot of people selling their services for the same employment demand you desire.
So to make things simple you'd somehow have the option to include both bitbay and bithalo to advertise your issue! The P2M advertisement could automatically convert Bays for Bitcoins (depending on your request, e.g., a 40% to 60% ratio), to perform the P2M markerting advertisement campaign on to both BitBay and BitHalo client users.
Obviously with it automated, it would make it that much easier to complete the process which would increase usage. It could also work both ways - Bays for Bitcoins or Bitcoins for Bays.
Heck this could be a standard feature built-in that some people might want to use all the time in their advertising and hit both top target groups in each coin's client.

All the while you are maximizing the 'capitalistic' approach to the matter as you are maximizing (to your budgets limits) the # of possible top associated counterparties, therefore creating an auction/bid style contract to receive the highest quality return at the most affordable price.

Am so glad this project is still going and seems to be going from strength to strength.

going to invest in this un found (as of yet) gem

If David will be able to communicate their ideas to their logical conclusion, then I think this project has very promising future. And it is one of the most undervalued coins in the history of the cryptocurrency, which creates favorable conditions for the early-stage investment.

Well that's the hardest part. He's already got so much on his plate to finish first.
I think we should gain some coder's interest in the near future as he progresses with the project.

Python smart contracts is one of the last items on the long list of things to complete.
But yeah, I agree. Who ever's been holding the price down will eventually run out.

I'm not sure why this isn't going through the roof...ok the past history on this coin isn't the best...but it looks bloody promising, maybe getting this thread to come up first on a google search rather than the old one will help a little...........and everyone should try and give poloniex a nod...they say they like to add coins with good devs and promising tech...lets see if they are true to their word.

They do and with the amount of consistent innovation happening with this coin, they will no longer want to ignore it. It will get added on Polo soon, I hope unless we fail in spreading the word and communicating our achievements to Poloniex.

I totally agree with your thoughts.
I'm not a big advocate of even holding coins on an exchange - once your done trading, withdraw immediately.
But as history has shown time and time again, that even after exchanges get hacked over and over, traders still end up leaving their coins in them for extended periods of time.

With that in mind, we might as well work with what they want. Yes, you are right Polo and Bittrex do not stake POS coins at the moment, but that's because they are afraid to because they would increase the exposure of these wallets to outsiders wanting to hack them. They would be deemed 'hot' wallets because they are online and running in order to mint new coins. They don't want to risk the possibility of their reputation if someone hacked their system. Once hacked, the first thing the hackers would go for is the 'hot' wallets. So for extra security they maintain their wallets in cold storage or offline. These can still be hacked buy in my opinion it typically can only be done by an insider in the exchange.

So the whole point of my post above is that with BitBay, it's unlike 99% of the other coins out there, as you are capable of using 2 private keys to access and run 1 wallet.
So this gives a lot more options to the user. Not only can these keys be encrypted with separate passphrases, David's added steganography to the client, so you could essentially hide the encrypted private keys inside images. With 2 private keys you can create joint accounts. Joint accounts would be no different than 2 business partners running a business and each partner has a key that unlocks the door to any funding they need to conduct business. It makes it impossible for 1 business partner to 'steal from the cookie jar' without the other's permission because the cookie jar has 2 locks on it.

Joint accounts don't have to be for 2 business partners. You could essentially create a joint account for yourself.
With this in mind, here is an example of how tight the security of BitBay really is...
You could essentially passphrase protect one key, hide it in an image and store it on a laptop. The second key is also passphrase protected, hidden in an image, yet stored on a raspberry pi.
So in order for someone to hack your joint account wallet, they'd first have to simultaneously hack both computer devices. Then locate the images with the keys inside of them. Then crack the passphrase that protects the private keys. I'm not saying that anything is impossible in the world of hacking, but I'm sure you could ask around - this wouldn't be easy to do by a long stretch!

Now with that in mind - imagine applying that to an exchanges cold wallet, hence why David calls it 'cold staking'.
The exchanges wallet could be 'hot' yet it's a joint account setup and only 1 key is hot while the other key cold and hiding on another computer device.
This could most likely only get hacked by an insider.

So yeah, polo and bittrex do not stake coins because they are afraid of exposing the hot wallets to hackers, but with BitBay's Halo Client, now they have a way to stake them and it would essentially be no different from still calling it a 'cold wallet'.

So why not stake and retain the rewards for profit?

I hope that clears things up for you. This is just one reason of many why I'm very bullish about the future of BitBay.

What i don't understand it that david is a very famous coder and conceptual designer. Other coders have recognised this... How are polo and the rest of the community not taking this project more seriously?

Even  that other smart coder that's been working on emunie seemed rather interested/impressed with davids ideas.

We need some whale interest else someone who is good at making people take notice.

I know eventually this project will be too important to be ignored but it needs to happen before the pegging takes place really. We want to be on big exchanges before that because installing some kind of custom software into their exchange may not be something they want to do. However if we are on there already generating a lot of volume they will not want to remove us.

Poloniex should add us, it's totally crazy that they don't.

They add coins with no development.

Does not make sense to me.