Great to see that you stick to your principles while being economical successful ! That's a not just a coin I invested in ... it's the idea behind

Explain us the huge dump???

• Free coins are only 2.5% p.a. - and only, if they remove every month their coins...now have a look at Richlist...you see a lot of wallets, which never moved their coins after 1 month.
• I am happy, that ERC is not trying to hype anonymous characters like ZCash, even if her sister BitSend could do that though.
• 70-90%??? We have 1 new ERC with every block. Actually we have around <60k blocks. If 90%, so they would reach 54k coins. Our market can absorb this actually.
• You forgot to read all projects, ERC is in. I would love it, if this guy would flood the market with his ERC in the future. Because this would significantly push values on all blockchainbased coins, which are connected on the Internet of Coins/Fedchain.

You shouldnt fear bad moves here. Even with ups and downs, the increasing volume will ruling this coin.

Greetz

1) RAM USE
You positively mentioned the ram-use funktion in Z-Cash. Your description sounds exactly like what Europecoin does.   
The "technical incorrect" term "Ram-Mining" describes that feature. (Specs are on the bottom of our OP)
Our Algo uses 1024 MB Ram per core. I also recommend to have a deeper look at our re-targeting mechanism,   
which stands out from any other coin except Bitsend. Feel free to tell me, if these information's are solving your concerns,   
i am interested in your opinion and i am always open to find out about ways to improve.

2) Some more thought about dumping:
Despite the fact that dumps are not an issue, because a coin has to survive any challenge.
If a dump feels like doing harm to a coin, its not the dump, which is the problem, its having not enough buyers, whats the problem.
Given that, we are working hard to improve, i am far from satisfied  with current buy support. We still have plenty of work to do.


3) Distribution in terms of dumping
But even with the current buy support, our distribution is very low and the amount of coins, that are being issued,
cannot really do any harm to our markets, even more we have already handled quite epic dumps without any real problems.

4) blaming dumps, a bad policy among maintainers to shift responsibility
But as i said, dumps are not responsible for ANY coins problems, WE are responsible to generate enough buy support.
I feel blaming dumps is a to often used by other maintainers, to distract from own failures. There is only ONE group of people, who is responsible
for the well being of this coin: The team of maintainers with the help of the community (like you).
Markets are free to do anything they want to our coin, we will take it as a friendly challenge to deal with it.
Being always responsible for the state of our coin is the most sustainable way to sty in control.

Coins, that can't survive even the markets of their own community, will not be able to win all those battles, needed to survive.
Every challenge, this movement has seen today, will look like ridiculous childsplay,
compared to what we will have to face in the coming 2-3 years to come. I am looking forward this adventure.
The race didn't yet begin.

thank you for your question and i am looking forward to read your thoughts
its fun
Matthias

.

---

Greetz
Steve

thank you very much, nice, you are passing by and you are still having an eye on us.
Our  project is evolving nice. people, like you, who have been in early, are knowing: Everything we are,
has been evolving out of our work. In fact you could say: The project created us, more than we created the project.
Founded by a loose idea, of whats wrong around us, the daily work was the motor, that made us learn, what has to be done
and what is the role for Europecoin, to contribute to a better society. That said:
We are also aware, why we didn't reach the peoples mind in the beginning, and why we are able to reach them now.
Our Ideas, concepts, minds and therefore our actions have gone through an "unblurring" process from complete "try-and-error" randomness,
to much more thoughtful and focused environment building.
And because we did this publicly, everybody can research about our intentions.
The most important key of this total honesty has been, to give a clear picture to ourself.
We will continue to cultivate this kind of open creativity.

concepts can't replace policy,
but policy can create concepts
thank you for this journey and the fun to come
Matthias


.

Blue logo is not visible on most of the backgrounds except on the last one. Should the background be changed or emphasize the logo different way?
I choose nr 4 because of that.

We were concerned about how well the coin logo is visible too.  Here is a better version of the third cover design: