Personally I feel a neutral may be more appropriate, but tbh I haven't really kept up with all this so I don't have a strong opinion about it. Too much childish bickering over too many threads (on all sides). Just my opinion, take it or leave it.

You had no problem calling me out for removal without knowing the entire situation, what is different now? Now I am responsible for other people creating threads calling him out on his abuse? What does that have to do with anything? Since VOD is on your trust list, isn't it your RESPONSIBILITY to keep up with accusations made against him since you effectively are one of 3 to grant him this power?

~Off-topic~

BCX, I've mentioned before that I appreciate some of the work you do in the Alt section. But in this instance, you are ill-informed on the subject of Techshare and his removal from Depth Level 2 of the Trust list. I need to make it clear that I don't know Techshare, and I have never conducted any business with him before. And as the admins can attest, I am not an alt of anyone

Techshare started a sales thread. Another member began posting persistently in the thread, questioning his price and accusing him of marking it up (my memory is a bit hazy on the details). After a long back and forth, Techshare left him a negative rating for trolling and unwisely added 1BTC as the risked amount. Perhaps in his mind (just speculating), the amount is from lost sales - I don't know. But that error in judgement led to a prolonged meta argument resulting in Techshare amending his feedback and removing the risked amount. Nevertheless, two DefaultTrust members removed him from their trust list, which consequently, took him off Level 2.

~On topic~

If you've read some of Techshare's stuff in the Politics section, you would understand what a principled person he is. I disagree with a lot of his politics, but it is nonetheless illuminating.

I've nothing against Vod personally. In fact, he removed a neg rating against a friend of mine after I messaged him. However, I think Vod was annoyed that Techshare used him as a point of argument against the Trust system, leading to the negative rating. Techshare was making a point, and Vod was his point. Hence the negative feedback, which I personally think is unwarranted.

I agree with you BadBear - I made the trust neutral.  I would be willing to remove it altogether but TECSHARE would need to stop spreading his lies about me.  I'm not protected by anyone on this forum and I am given no special treatment.   

People in the default trust list have to watch their negative trust more closely. 

You have yet again accused that TECSHARE "lied" about you, despite never pointing to a single lie that he has made about you. You have been asked by multiple people to elaborate on what exactly are the "lies" that TECSHARE is "spreading" about you.

You somehow have this complex that anyone who thinks you don't deserve to be on defaulttrust is lying about you, or is a hacked account. Based on theymos' previous precendent, you absolutely and unquestionably do not deserve to be on defaulttrust no matter how many scammers you neg rep.

Do you think that statement I have made about you is a "lie"? Is that what qualifies as a "lie?"

Again, we're all waiting for you to give a single lie that TECSHARE has told about you. Since this forum has a mission of free speech, everyone can (i) criticize your actions, and (ii) suggest that you be removed from DefaultTrust, and everyone can continue to criticize you over an extended period of time (when not disruptive). That's not lying.

You still seem to have me blocked, So I am unable to PM you. But I'm somewhat tired of this and would like to come to an agreement. I do not deserve a Scammer tag, no matter how it is looked at, and would like to fix that. I removed any comment toward you this morning.

Oh well than, thank you. I don't see his feedback, so wasn't aware.

Edit:
Well I guess that's better than it was.

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

/thread

Do you have a reading disability?


Mind answering this seriously? The longer you refuse to answer, the more people will think that you have no basis for your tantrum and invented the claim that TECSHARE lied about you.

I've updated my feedback appropriately to point out that you have made (and are still making) a number of disparaging claims about users, such as that they lied, without ever pointing to when they lied.