So all you need is someone else to program it for you and someone else to pay for the programmers. So where would you come in?

Somebody did the financial backing. Somebody else did the hacking. He's just an ideaman, who is worthless. He have some programming skill, so he isn't entirely worthless.

Anybody can have a "brilliant idea" and a "vision", but can you survive at time self-doubt, loss of willpower, and intense negative feedback?

Idea thinking is the first step in a long marathon.

(Witness http://bitcoinweekly.com as it survives high turnover of employees/freelancers, editor resignation, one pdf and two sites and the founder's resignation from The Bitcoin Times)

Speaking of delegation, I don't man the editor post anymore. Mostly, I advertise their articles and write the codebase that let my writers do their work.

That's a business valuation, not a personal insult.

I considered people who plays with only ideas, totally worthless as far as moneymaking goes.

Got a better argument for that? 

The argument is that there are plenty wealthy and technical people around. The true great things happen when they are united by visionary people who don't know much about either but dare to dream

This is what I like to see. Execution. Everything is 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration.