The price is very off putting, you are trying to raise 2 million dollars on an idea that isn't actually made yet?
There's a lot that has already been made.
you have majorly over valued your business especially since it looks like the only way to complete this project will be getting enough funding, so you are totally relying on investors to fund to project while giving them a fixed price determined completely by yourself.
I announced quite the contrary: the obligation to supply the products is independent at the number of coins sold. Moreover, unsold coins will be destroyed before the actual coins go live, so buyers will get a bigger share on that case.
Obviously, more funding will positively affect the timeline and richness of the products.
More funding would be achieved if investors determined a free market valuation of what is on offer, not a pre determined price by the creator who has very subjectively valued their own idea which 95% of the time is massively over valued from the real term value, which will be destroyed when any free market economics are introduced .
Good to know the whole project isn't dependent on funding but if more would help, massively over valuing the currency will actually hugely reduce the earning potential of such an idea.
Investors will be investing in the coin at the present time they invest , so the reduction or destruction of coins doesn't really benefit them , they are not coins that are already created really, they are just coins that "might be" created .
If i invested now, it wouldn't change much if all the coins were not sold. If 100,000 is invested by investors the value is that price, if only 50k is invested Then the value of the currency is 50k , destroying coins doesn't benefit them, only leaving the coins there would be at a huge disadvantage to the previous investors. destroying them is a pretty neutral act really to those already invested