At last I think we have found common ground. A good project will withstand the fud and attempts at it. I agree on that with you fully. So lets see then where this goes, let the devs execute their plans and if you are right I will apologize. All I am asking then is to give them a chance and let them carry on with their work and not actively destroy their efforts.

The only reason that I am still reluctant to bite on your theory is because the price for the placement was the outcome of a poll if you remember. Personally I did not vote for 120k due to feasibility but a lower price. If the dev on his own unilateraly decided on 120k I would have been more open to your theory.

It is interesting that you claim to know what goes on inside my head. This makes me wonder if it is the same methods you applied to know what goes inside the devs head. I told you earlier what my plan is yet you say something different in your last post. Anyways I am not asking anything but to not attempt to wreck a project that shows promise. That is all and not unreasonable. If the 120k price and number of coins turns out to be too high an amount voted on by the community (not the dev) then lower it.

I presume you were present here and observing during the voting process for this placement? These are the facts. You will remember the dev expressing the need to hold a conference for marketing purposes and needed to raise funds for it. The community agreed. The dev then put up a poll with different amounts of coins and different prices ranging from 100k to 400k coins and I think 75k price to 120k price. The community voted and the 400k coins at 120k won. The dev then executed on that mandate. It would have been a different matter if the community voted on 100k coins and 75k price and he executed 400k coins at 120k price. It is therefore harsh to call it "stealing" if the dev is actually executing to community vote. No-one said the price of 120k will be successful and it is something that the dev can take back to the community if sufficient funds are not raised at 120k. I have not seen any evidence yet of wrongdoing and if you consider supporting price as such a big crime then rather focus your efforts on the tens of flyby ICOs on the exchanges where the dev disappears an hour after the ICO ends. That is where the big crime is that needs focus and attention.

You will NOT get the 500 BTC, you can count on that.

And, for now, forgive me but I am trying to set some straight things along another scammer at the ARCH mess. Be well... but you will NOT scam PEOPLE IF i CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

Please spare me the horseshit, ok? You are "building" this portal for one reason and one reason only: Money. Money for you, not for anyone else. You want to have sole access to trading information in a centralized way, ACTIONABLE information with guaranteed profits FOR YOU AND ONLY FOR YOU, ok? That's the purpose of this whole thing, nothing else, OK? And it is transparent to anyone at all that has anything, I repeat, under their scalp. P e r i o d. Dignity, a market manipulator like you? You don't have any idea what that word means... I doubt you would have any even after googling it... do it, just in case. It can only benefit you.

And I don't care if you have a lot of money or not, it's not mine so... you can spend it any way you want, but what you have done to "add liquidity", is both immoral and illegal. What you have done to inflate the price, is immoral and illegal. This is America, kid, you better be careful with what you do, alright?  Of course you would love to have "more liquidity", who the fuck wouldn't? but your project and you are killers: No one is interested. Really, no one. Liquidity, for you to get it, is NOT bringing offers (coins) to the market, it is just the opposite, having BUYERS. So far YOU are, basically, the only buyer here. That's why there's no liquidity. That's why there's no market for MTR. Not at 100k. Not at 50k not at 20k. The price doesn't really matter, because so far the only price of this coin is FALSE PRETENSE, no real investors. Just what you have sold to yourself (going to 400k+ was circus, really, don't you think?). Sorry that reality will bit you in the ass that way but I have been observing the whole thing since the beginning and your actions? Transparent, truly. Even a child could see what you were doing.

You are going to sell very few of those 400k. If any at all (I sense your real investors are all loaded up to capacity already and they surely won't pay 120k). So you will continue. Will you continue buying to keep it listed? I'm sure you will. But then what happens when, finally, those investors, including those posting here, realize that you have taken them for a ride and a very bad one at that, with no possible exit? Well, I just described to you the future.

Try to be honest (and act with dignity) next time. It sure won't pay worse that acting dishonest like you have and are, is going to.

What you are attempting is a bit on the complex side. It depends on what your objective is if it is worth the effort. Is it for security reasons? Is it for energy saving reasons? If it is for engergy, I would recommend setting up a Raspberry Pi and run your wallet there 24/7 at 5W of electricity.

If you want to run different wallets on one PC, then you have to create separate directories on your PC "somewhere" of your liking. You then create desktop icons for each instance eg MTR1, MTR2 etc. in the path you specify the mastertrader.exe and add -datadir=pathtoyourdatadir. You can then fire up each instance and it will co-exist. I would recommend putting a bootstrap.dat into each directory where your wallet.dat files are. There is a bootstrap.dat that I made at around 50k+ in the thread but I can update that to current 110k.

I'm about to empty out my piggy bank for some mtr. I see 120k worth it in my opinion.

It is consolidation, control, convenience, security, cost, energy reasons.

Plus I want to see if having a "Hive" of 10 Miners keeps a more steady Mining percentage and even out some of the staking spikes up and down.

It can't be that tough.
I have a server running 24/7 that I can access remotely and check on things
OR shouldn't I also be able to open up a local hive at the same time?

Haven't asked that yet either (Can I have the same wallet running on two machines?)

What are the risks of doing so?

Funny indeed that a bunch of derelicts the likes of which has never been seen together since "The Dirty Dozen", would pretend to endorse crap under the guise of "dignity". The only one missing is the supreme commander, Bobsurplus, who is probably missing only temporarily. Wow, wow, wow... and I thought I had seen it all already.

Hello Allforone,

You can check the countdown timer on www.ToshiTalk.com

I will get a countdown timer uploaded to the thread in just a bit.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777
You can always count on that!


Yeah you aren't going to mine any extra coins using multiple wallets and/or instances. Fill me in on why you're trying to run things that way…and maybe I can better understand what you are trying to achieve. If its more coins, you are better off resetting network weight on certain batches of coins inside one wallet every week.