If such fund is really established, I will add 1 BTC myself which should be distributed to the "supporters" if I should not be able to acheive such thing.
I don't know what you mean by established - as you can tell, my status is slightly above noob. I therefore do not know the ins and outs of bounties - for instance, if escrows are required etc. Though I'm assuming it may be difficult to find a mediator third party thats not vested. If any of the die-hard bitcoiners are around (i.e., there's only 1 true coin), their volunteering would be appreciated. Darnit, where's my decentralized truth oracle blockchain when I need it?
I'm a man of science - and it looks like this is the crytpocurrencies equivalent of peer review.
But for those following, Evil-K has offered a 1 BTC counter-bounty.
If such fund is really established, I will add 1 BTC myself which should be distributed to the "supporters" if I should not be able to acheive such thing.
I'm assuming the way this functions is 1 BTC will be distributed amongst those offering a bounty in the case that Evil-Knievel doesn't make a Darkcoin De-privatization Explorer.
May I also present that this explorer should work on the latest "patch" as well - whatever the DRK devs are referring to as masternode blinding.
Also, hopefully the XMR v DRK has died down - but if not, here's a thread
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/962235.240;topicseenPlease - this thread is about DRK's privacy technology - not alleged coin distribution problems.
