Differences to TOR
The main characteristic in which I2P differs from TOR is the focus of the project.
While TOR was designed with the intention to enable anonymous internet brows-
ing, I2P’s focus is to provide an anonymous network, isolated inside the internet,
offering various protocols and applications within. It is however possible to utilize
I2P outproxies to reach the internet and thus enable anonymous web browsing.
Another difference to the TOR network is, that I2P tunnels can only be used unidirectional compared to TOR’s bidi-
rectional tunnels. Also, as mentioned in Section 1.1 I2P uses garlic encryption
where TOR uses onion encryption. Both implementations are based on layered
encryption, garlic encryption offering the possibility to store multiple messages
inside the innermost layer [3].

http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~semu/docs/2011_seminar_ehlert_i2p.pdf   - must read

Introduction to I2P
I2P is a peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay network which allows participants to interact
anonymously within this network. Similar to TOR (The Onion Router) I2P is a
mix network
which relies on routing data trough multiple peers to render tracing
virtually impossible [1]. The project was rst proposed in 2003, having its roots
in the Invisible Internet Project (IIP), an anonymous real time communication
project.  Development  has  actively  been  going  on  since  this  time.  Today  I2P
already oers a range of applications which can be used inside the network such
as anonymous web browsing, chatting, le-sharing and e-mailing [

What a beast of a coin. ICM very smart. People like OPTIONS. He gives many options ...i2p...toR....custom markets

ICM: When will instantX be back and darksend?


What's your response to people saying Crave has no
innovation and is just a copy paste thrown together?

The only issue I see now with Crave is the annonymous part.
How do we mix our Crave? Blur I understand is an asset so it's not
anon cash like Dark was...can you help me understand?

Will blur have its own addresses and wallets? Or be similar to ShadowTokens and shadowcash type thing in wallet?

How exactly will users create the market? In wallet...will we get more details soon? will they be built into the blockchain like syscoin ?


BTW ICM: that 52 btc is for the escrow. You get me the market I have 100+btc. The second it drops. Right now your project and vision is the most intelligent   and well planned. I will continue to support you and quality development...and as long as you continue to help myself and the rest of the community understand everything and implement the features we want as you have been.

Thank you ICM.

" IN ICM WE TRUST " 

Congrats on implementing i2p. Well done

NSA monitoring almost all TOR nodes, so if you want a good resource for to mask your IP, you should use I2P.

There's no doubt, crave is place to be. Crave has more developing one month than any other coin in its all life, multsignature will raise the level of security blockchain and ICM will solve an old problem of bitcoin code... Crave is becoming the better cryptocoin of market.

Articles about multsig

http://www.coindesk.com/year-multisig-so-far/

http://www.coindesk.com/cosign-wallet-streamlines-multisignature-transactions-enhances-security/

http://www.coindesk.com/bitpay-open-source-multi-signature-bitcoin-wallet/

With relationship market, msg and other resources, I do not even know what should I say ... This coin is now so devalued that I just bought another 2K today ...  

hopefully tm2013 can chime in, not to many of us seem to be familiar with darkpoold. all i know is the max per address is 1k crave, though you say you used separate address should be fine. you can see that it sent the crave so it should have associate the blur. can you dump a total blur asset list for us?

Sure, sadly my address from today is not in it. 

Asset Name: BLUR
Asset ID: 1
Divisible: True
Supply: 45394.1231487
Issuer: None
Callable: False
Call Date: None
Call Price: None
Description: ‘’
Shareholders:
   address, quantity, escrow
   BzJNRFUk3Jq3udiEkjaQ941z6qAdeEwqGC,4.97048611,None
   CAo7D2Z65cAREopaomYVPW4BKDidCSREJ3,77.6127662,None
   C1t9wFGi6X7MCNewkQg42gS72xQwWfaCfa,161.65075231,None
   BsouHVsKJmV9Mxc8DktyyKHRXfLEnaFu1H,5832.42755122,None
   C4RDRgfXfrG76givB2yve3shduuEHAATZq,3224.73958333,None
   BvjkwgZDYF51xy8cJDD17FKVHbBh2NDA8c,6425.39290509,None
   CGTpRSzsRhcyjLtR6fJdbqifsB6NyVPaX6,1603.82233796,None
   C74iucFC24dDjJeoux5PnC9ESg82i5a861,2565.14559028,None
   C5MqodUyKixEyVtwEjREuny8Gd7vr69Lyg,641.39467593,None
   Btrsc1VN6Eag8E9HvMdxyVLrD7mNpxfZeG,628.43802083,None
   C5kDsnn5m1uRCswpwF4unpakLqymGn1d73,504.48871713,None
   CBgwMwT3v9jFWWAwbmonL7ncbvsLxEfbif,4028.8125,None
   C3QN2UWHnS8uuFJ34Z76V7BWqU3Gfm18V3,3274.94444444,None
   BupqtQCaAhMn3TjJSATEzdbG77uFP9GBkE,98.72345903,None
   C3ZFUQh29ko4DJT1Rn7K2M53VKhqRMhdFM,1506.23958333,None
   CCuJtmfTzADhAU3t9SrxWGiRxV6qS2FoQB,839.80012213,None
   BsqMebgQvo7WruYuUXJD8E9k5FSNDbqrBE,151.72427083,None
   C43PdGUxd6HpXCbDb5HHk3Zjeae6xkR9Hy,4361.9162037,None
   C9RVUxxJDzKZD2Y66q7gjZ2Jzfpbn3rLvf,297.27719907,None
   CAvkALqUPh1MUH3Z8MCfhZKrs4AytMtYFW,589.34027778,None
   CBiQ13a7fgpuzpFMED5FRS6537nesyof36,2986.44925987,None
   C4ShevmNEgK4t9T9UW4KZrWnCsbbneettX,117.90717593,None
   Bt4UpPzP1TtpfgyWves8VBTNcDrKPZ1sxY,5370.9052662,None
   CA3VPam7b8sPvgPVZhtShjo35aM2XjEvjd,100.0,None

try restarting the darkpoold server.
/darkpoold.py server

Restart did not help

I also tried the reprocess command and even deleted the existing DB so it would start clean and go through all the blocks.  During the reprocess I see other blocks that show the burn it does not for block 52061.  My prior 2 burns were OK but not this one. 

I thought maybe I am not seeing the whole asset list, but if I run a darkpool balances for the first address I see a BLUR balance but for todays address it does not show a BLUR balance.  So the network did not credit me even though it took the Crave.