Great proofs there.  Overwhelming evidence.  All you have is insults. 

No need to project ignorance on you.  You have taken care of that quite nicely with your "I can see the curve with my binoculars"  LOL. 

The video provided and a little knowledge of anatomy shows anyone here that you are a fool and a liar.

"Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending"  Another doosie.  Not even sure what to say about this one.  You have actually trumped your curve seen from binoculars stupidity with this one. 

I will let you just keep going. Your doing  a fine job of making an ass out of yourself.  Keep talking.  We are loving it. 

Suchmoon quotes
"I can see the curve with my binoculars"
"Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending"

Can you feel the Moon's frosty gaze?

Can you please show some empirical proof of the gravitational effects on space/time.  I would be very interested in your demonstration of this.  I would love to see a working example of this.  

If you can make a large object attract a small object as the Newtonian model suggests I would love to see this demonstrated as well.  I think the last time it took place was in the 1790's in Mr. Cavendish's shed.  Unfortunately he was the only one who saw it.

Hopefully with you apparent high education you can all show us this.  You will also be rewarded handsomely by the science community as well due to the fact they are having a bit of trouble showing a display of any of this.  

Do you know this science your speaking of or is it a belief?

Very excited to see your demonstrations.  Extra credit if you can do it without insults.

Folks, I'm asking the simplest, most basic and least complex physical question possible. After 50 pages of discussing the Lorentz contraction, its reasoning, proofs and feasibility it becomes obvious it's an artifact of the provably false model that special relativity describes. Why engage in pilpul wandering off into complex mathematical equations that have no basis in reality when you can answer this one simple (two-part) question:

   If the Moon is a sphere illuminated by the Sun, why is it missing shading around the edges and a hot spot in the middle?

Thanks for your polite response.   It's appreciated.

#1 Have you personally been to the true north and south pole?   All my research indicates there is a military blockade and no true independent exploration or experimentation can be done.   Can you practically demonstrate, from the poles (which I don't think the two sides agree upon anyways) your experiment?   Who proved it?   How was the experiment done?   Do you simply believe these results that were given to you?   I think this is the fundamental issue the two sides are having.   I'm a practical person.   I want to see it and do the experiment for myself.   Not be told.   If you choose to believe the finding you were given that fine but know all you have is a belief.   I think the flat earthers want proof and everything that they can prove for themselves is showing flat earth.   Hence the debate.

#2 Assuming I take the spring scale example at face value as I have not done this experiment, how do you know it was gravity which caused your results and not something else.   Most in this thread do not believe in gravity so that claim must be proven.   Can you prove to us gravity is the cause of your findings?   How did you rule out all other factors?

Once again I'm not attempting to be argumentative but we are 600 pages in.   We need proof, not stories about experiments none of us have ever seen, done or can verify.   It sounds like all that is happening is your preaching the science you were given.   It's understandable given that if you repeat it well enough you get A's in school and get a nice job!   

Globe Earth requires globe Moon, prove the globe by explaining how the Moon is evenly lit! Explain in detail how the fact there's no shading around the edges or a hot spot in the middle proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Moon is a sphere lit by the Sun.

Use science, you can do it!

Nothing but insults.  This from Mr. do you know astrophysics.  What a joke. 

Great proofs by the way! 

We know how things fall but we don't know why they fall.    Show us your proof if you have any.

We will be waiting for your proofs or more insults. 

Sorry, I'm not into this deeply enough to be able to show the proof. The best I can do is direct you to what others say. Google "weight difference between equator and poles."

As for the gravitational pull of the mass of a mountain, you might Google "gravitational force of a mountain."

10-4.  I respect your response.