Nice, now that we've established that I'm stupid and crazy because I can measure angular size with a sextant. We've got additional proof that I'm a paid liar, an idiot and insane with the law gravity, this unproven theory is clearly the proof beyond any resonance doubt I'm mad. You go Vod, show 'em that gravitationally curved water!

You guys seriously need rope.

---

---

Meanwhile at the airport....

Four Commercial Airline Pilots Admit The Earth is Flat -- https://youtu.be/18QtOZapc38

As previously mentioned what does measuring angular size with a sextant prove exactly? It doesn't prove anything, don't see your point here.

''There's no vanishing point on a globe'' Why not?

''The sextant measures angular size from the vanishing point'' Who told you this? https://www.wikihow.com/Use-a-Sextant

There's no vanishing point on a globe because it's hidden behind curvature. Who told me how to measure angular size? Well certainly not the Jews at wikipedia, those wikihow instructions are just the basics and don't cover angular size. Measuring angular size is covered up, it's a conspiracy (Jews control all information with few exceptions) and there's no readily available source that will discuss measurement because it's impossible to measure on a globe. I've explained how angular size measurement works, you should kill yourself instead of insisting it's impossible.

Assuming the earth is round, there are currently no laws of physics that are broken. There hasn't really been any "broken" physics since the early 1800s. There have been improvements, but a lot of it, we've had figured out for a few thousand years. We are just getting more accurate with more precise measuring instruments and expanding theories. There are are currently small correction factors from theoretical fields and particles that may or may not exist, but there is no question that physics as it exists now works as we expect it to 100% of the time.

I'm not sure what you mean by, you cannot bend water? And you are correct, you cannot have a system with 101300 Pa of pressure right next to a system with 0 Pa of pressure. Think of what happens when a hatch opens up on a pressurized cabin of an airplane up in the sky where the pressure is lower. You can however have 101300 and 101299 Pa next to one another, and 101298 next to that 101299, and so on and so forth until you get reallllly high up in the sky where you have 1 Pa next to 2 Pa and eventually 0 Pa.

How do you think it finds ''its level'' dummy? Besides how did you come up with the rule ''water always finds it's level''? Have you done experiments on this? What is the definition of level? Water’s level is dependent on the shape of Earth’s gravitational field.

You don't think water finds it's level?   

All bodies of water that I see and deal with on a daily basis find their level.  A cup of water, toilet water, bathtub.  Everywhere around me water is level.  Where is this bendy water you speak of? 

I have no idea how it finds its level.   If your going to invoke gravity show us how you were able to curve space time to level the water in your experiment. 

As I've said before, I don't dislike your motivation, but I feel you are mixing the desire to find a flaw and what we currently hold true, and to learn for yourself. Have you taken any physics classes in the past? Its not a matter of listening to what you are told and applying formulas, its about learning the means of natural phenomena happening, and making sure it coincides with your understanding. After every single lecture, it all needs to make physical sense. And you build on material. Skipping from, what is gravity, to the neorelativistic model is jumping ahead 1000 steps, and a great way to cause misunderstandings. If you are still trying to rationalize whether these things make sense or not, start with the simple version before adding in additional detail. Gravity, Elves, Density, whatever you want to call it will always work the way we expect it to. We can represent it with equations, it doesn't matter whether the equation is solving for gravity, density, or elves. The point is that it exists and is observable. Humans have yet to find a situation where it doesn't apply the way we expect it to.

 So far, I've only been using Newtonian physics, because its 99.99% accurate, without the 6 years of formal education you need to understand the most basic concepts of time. Fourth dimensional analysis is not fun and not observable. It requires you to restrict your bounds and use math operations to confine it back into 3 space.

Water "finding level" is an analysis of potential energy and fluid dynamics. "Level" is an arbitrary gravitational level point. After reading a lot of these posts, I think a major concern is people keeping their reference points consistent.

So what is it? You didn't answer at all, how do you calculate where the vanishing point is and how do you use that to measure angular diameter with a sextant? You lying?

''a practical demonstration of gravity'' Rockets in space but then again you don't believe in space or rockets so it is kind of hard to provide a practical demonstration for you. Can you prove it's density? Because gravity has been accepted for many years now, you are the one challenging the fact that gravity exists.

''If you don't know what level is'' You clearly lack scientific knowledge and the only thing you can do is be a parrot or rather an NPC parroting the same thing over and over again, WATER FINDS ITS LEVEL HEHEHE.

''not effect the helium balloon'' It's affect btw, and it's fairly simple, I mean do you actually not know why or are you trolling?