what is gravity? Definition; the force that attracts a body toward the center of the earth, or toward any other physical body having mass. For most purposes Newton's laws of gravity apply, with minor modifications to take the general theory of relativity into account.

dumbed down: Big dense mass attracts more mass. a small representation of this is if you have a steady flow of water (out of your sink perhaps) and place an object close to it. (not under it) the waters path will no longer be straight down but rather askew tward the object. (different objects dhow this better)

what is a nature of suns light? Not sure what you mean by nature of sunlight. sunlight (or rather any light) is composed of the different colors of the spectrum of light. light is also pure energy thus meaning heat. sunlight also carries light that we cannot perceive with the naked eye, this light (UV for instance) is irradiated. when light hits an object light is absorbed and other light is reflected. the light reflected is what gives us color. for instance black absorbs all light. (why black items get hot because it holds the light) thus reflecting no light meaning that we perceive it as black. there are some objects that reflect nearly all light these are reflective for instance a mirror or moon dust. then there are objects that are see through that allow light to not be absorbed or reflected. these are transparent like windows or air. however sometimes not all light can be passed through and some colors appears more prominently such as mirrors have a very slight green tint to the reflections. water also can be transparent but in vast quantities it becomes clear that it can also reflect light. such as the ocean reflecting the blue in the sky. The sky is blue because molecules in the air scatter blue light from the sun more than they scatter red light. When we look towards the sun at sunset, we see red and orange colors because the blue light has been scattered out and away from the line of sight.

Edit im just going to leave this here (https://www.inverse.com/article/10770-people-who-think-the-earth-is-flat-are-wrong-but-flat-earthers-aren-t-nuts)

@gravity - Youve got to be kidding with that water experiment. Who have told you it works? This water aint moving a bit. Who've told you that? Those are just particles hiting other particles of water changing its trajectory. Sorry i didnt sense a jedi powers before i touch the water changing its trajectory by making a water cascade. Its more resembling a waterfall than a gravitation. Thats the best you could do? If any physicians will prove the gravity by attaction of a mass he would for 100% get the nobel price. Ain't going to happen. And yes yadayadayada - you have been and seen the earth core. Blessed are those who believed but havnt seen. Alleluya! Its just in a best way an asssumption. On the worst case its fucked up religion.

And yes im not talking about if gravity has force. It does mmmk? Dont mess newton into that. He doesnt explain what is a gravity he just says - hey man, dont fall of that window unless you want to have x-force on your face or spine equal to your massive fat body with increasing speed as you fall.

@sun - I was suggesting that scientists claim that the light is produced as byproduct of nuclear fission, made by itself, because supposed gravity is so high it squizes the little jesus out of atoms and they become one - like in the Highlander movie.

All I can say to that is

please enlighten us on how to disprove gravity...

The claim "gravity is technically just a theory" ranges from completely wrong to completely obvious depending on what you mean by the words "gravity" and "theory". That's because those words (like most words) have multiple meanings, and those meanings can be particularly different in everyday speech compared to technical jargon.

First of all, like many others have said, gravity is a phenomenon, not a theory. There are several different theories describing this phenomenon. That the phenomenon itself exists is hard to doubt, except of course if you're willing to believe that it's all just a dream or we're living in a simulation.

Secondly, "theory" has several different meanings. In common speech, a "theory" is little more than a hunch. It's just some explanation you came up with by thinking about it for 5 minutes. That's very different from what the word "theory" tends to mean when used by scientists.

Scientists typically only call something a "theory" if it is a precise framework for understanding a large number of facts, and this usually only after that framework has been thoroughly tested. So saying "just a theory" is effectively an oxymoron: in science, a theory is pretty much the highest point for an idea to reach.

Interestingly, in particle physics at least, the term "theory" has acquired a third meaning, as a very precise mathematical description of a system that may or may not exist in reality. So people, for example, talk about N=4N=4 super-symmetric Yang–Mills theory, although there is no experimental verification that super-symmetry or con-formal symmetry even exist, let alone be described in that particular way. This isn't because physicists are crazy or stupid; it's because they use the term with a different meaning, and this meaning is clear from context.

So, just like when you talk about a pride of lions or a murder of crows you don't confuse them with a person's pride or his violent demise, make sure to not confuse one meaning of the word "theory" with another!

Now, I said that the statement "gravity is technically just a theory" can range from wrong to trivial depending on what you mean by the words. How is that? First of all, if by gravity you mean the phenomenon, then it's isn't a theory at all. If you instead mean a specific theory, like Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of general relativity, then it depends on what you mean by "theory". If you're referring to the layman's notion of a "theory", then the statement is absolutely false: there are huge numbers of experiments showing that each of those theories is good within its range of applicability. They both are most definitely much more than "just a theory". (If you're confused about the claim that both theories are good, see Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong).

If instead you mean "theory" in the scientific sense, then of course any model of gravity is "just" a theory: since such a model makes claims about how gravity worked, works, and will work everywhere in the universe and for all of time, it's obvious that we can never fully test it. For all we know, gravity might work differently starting tomorrow. So in this sense, the claim is trivial.

So when you say it has not been "Proven" then that is wrong. because gravity is as true as humanity, as time, as mass. just because there may be different takes that are educated guesses, doesnt mean it is not a force. the law of gravity is just that a physical LAW. besides even if it was "Just a theory" it is still a hell of a lot more then anyone else has including all of flat earth claims.

So finally i ask show me how to disprove gravity.

You dont understand. All the right sight of the equation is just based on assumption that earth is a ball. We have an unknown mass and some constant that is an assumption as well. Doesnt it bothering you? m- mass is assumtion. r(square) - earth being a ball - assumption. G- assumption. Its looks like not based at facts AT ALL. Only the left sight of equation an earth acceleration is based on facts.

Im telling you there are no facts and you keep saying the facts could be different tomorrow. There are just assumptions.

Ill say the last thing on the matter:

If we base our theories only on maths there is not certain that they are based on reality.


Physicians says they dont know what kind of force is a gravity and you say they constantly try to disprove that they dont know what it is? That discourse tires me. Im speaking about one thing and you say another stuff. Do you speak with google or with me?

WOW!!!  Russianvids and Flat Earth Asshole... Just by their names on YT I can smell a puddle of science there... what renowned and reliable sources you've got to debunk the debunkers.

Here is a quote for you FEs: "Stupidity isn't the lack of knowledge, but the illusion of having it." - Grigore Iulian