Rockets are not used in space they are used on earth to get hardware into orbit. After that they fall back to earth.. plop into the ocean.. So what's all this about rockets not working in space? Who cares we don't use them in space. 

See also:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=space+is+fake+nasa+lies

The assumption that you keep making which is wrong is that pressure in the engine pushes against the outside pressure (atmosphere) to produce thrust, it doesn't. The outside pressure actually works against the thrust of the engine by slowing down the escaping gases. A good way to get your head around this is to think about what would happen if you stopped the gases from escaping the engine by blocking off the exhaust exit. If you did this the pressure would be equalized in all directions and no propulsion could occur.


The engineers study physics as part of their education process. Engineers generally specialise in particular fields, so you would have many engineers working together each contributing in their own areas.


Not trying to cheat or confuse you at all. The reason they don't analyse the mentioned fields is that while they would both affect the amount of thrust being produced, they don't change the principals behind how the engine produces thrust. Think of it this way, regardless of how the fuel flows into the engine and how much expansion occurs when the fuel is burned, pressure is still created that pushes against the inside walls of the engine and this fact is the key to understanding how they work.

Ah yes, that would explain the odorous slug trail you leave behind you.

It's funny that you mention compression, as it's the compression of the gases released from the burning mixture that push in all directions causing the pressure within the engine and thus the thrust. While a small amount of compression would occur between the escaping gases and the atmosphere there is nothing restricting the flow of gases outside the rocket so it's negligible.

I've fixed a number of four stroke engines over the years, so I'm quite familiar with the internal combustion engine, wrenches and screwdrivers. How about you?

No its you who make the wrong assumptions. You keep on talking about external gas to the engines like if its a one body within the rocket. Those are not. Even when gases are interior to the engine structure they are still external bodies per se. Gases around you may move very fast they dont affect you unless you compress them against you. Then and only then you might talk about gases affecting another bodies by a compression.

And yes it might seem they are part of rocket becuase they are inside the engine, but they are not a part of the rocket neither any objects with different density is not a part of another body unless you compress them against that body.


Engineers are not scientists. To be an engineer all you have to have is a master degree. To be a scientist you need phd. Someone else gives them assumptions and they build stuff based on that assumptions. Difference between a rockets works in vaccum and there is no vacuum in space is completly and utterly irrelevant for them.

I dont want to assume that they dont understand that you cant lift yourself by the belt. Maybe 4 years in college to be an engineer is to little time to understand that you cant but.... What can I say. Im not physicist maybe they figured out the way how to lift yourself up.

If something works inside a physical body it does not mean that it can move the body in any direction without the external force. If you create forces (newtons) inside the physical body the forces even themselfs (as in the law of thermodynamics) out in every direction if not acted upon by external forces. That is like elementary school physics.


So? Does that makes theory of relativity valid at that kind of speeds? No. Its still a normal physics. Its just makes pressure higher IF A PRESSURE IS BUILT. IF is very important here.

Higher molecules speed makes it possible to use slower moving molecules as if they are different density objects to create a pressure but you need both of them.


Thats a BS. Gas is a gas. Freshly exploded gas with unfreshly exploded gas what does that even mean? Either something has same or different density or speed of particles or is soon to be the same fluid. How do you want to divide the gas? By what measures?

The atmosphere is under tremendous pressure and greatly restricts the flow of expanding gasses from the rocket nozzle. The pressure caused by the flow of expanding gasses compresses the atmosphere and it's this force between the rocket engine and atmosphere that causes thrust.

And you lick it, making your tongue stuck there, so you could never tell humanity about it.

So a force affecting a gas does not affect other bodies so why bother with explaining gas? There need to be some connection and the only connection there could be is pressure.


Everybody is making assumptions or using someone elses assumptions. No sorry brainless people dont make assumptions, but yeah I discluded those.

BRAIN works on assumptions.

Experiments are repeated. On Earth. Well. Yeah they are and you just "assume" its the same in supposed vacuum.  Hence the space is vacuum because noone does experiments if a space is vacuum. Got it?

We are not talking about if a rocket works. THEY DO. We are talking about space being a vacuum or not. Got it? And that thing is just assumed not testen, proven peer reviewed or anything. This issue is just ignored.


You have not explained ANYTHING. You have just gave me some stupid article ignoring a thermodynamics - the only thing worth mentioning in the rockets, and you have told me im wrong in assuming something and didnt explain why.

Should be able to go around in a full circle in any direction.. north, south, east, or west.
How do flat earth'ers explain their way out of that one ?

The explanation earlier seems to potentially work in only west/east.